Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fold prediction by a hierarchy of sequence, threading, and modeling methods

L Jaroszewski1, L Rychlewski, B Zhang

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.

Protein Science : a Publication of the Protein Society
|July 9, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Hybrid methods for protein fold recognition, combining sequence and structure data, show superior accuracy. Sequence similarity is the primary driver, suggesting evolutionary links and enhancing fold recognition

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational protein function prediction: are we making progress?

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2007
Same author

The status of structural genomics defined through the analysis of current targets and structures.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2004
Same author

The apoptosis database.

Cell death and differentiation·2003
Same author

Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs.

Nature·2002
Same author

Fold predictions for bacterial genomes.

Journal of structural biology·2001
Same author

CLAN, a novel human CED-4-like gene.

Genomics·2001

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Protein science

Background:

  • Protein fold recognition is crucial for understanding protein function.
  • Existing methods include sequence-based, threading, and hybrid approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and significance of various fold recognition algorithms.
  • To investigate the contribution of sequence similarity versus structural information in fold prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of hybrid, sequence-based, and threading methods on standard benchmarks.
  • Development of a 'jury' method combining predictions from multiple algorithms.
  • Utilizing significance estimates and 3D model building to refine predictions and eliminate false positives.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Hybrid methods outperform sequence and threading methods in accurate fold predictions.
  • Sequence similarity is the most significant factor contributing to prediction accuracy.
  • A combined 'jury' method achieves higher accuracy than individual methods.
  • 3D model analysis effectively removes false positives.

Conclusions:

  • Protein fold recognition is strongly influenced by evolutionary relationships indicated by sequence similarity.
  • Hybrid methods offer enhanced accuracy for fold prediction.
  • Combining multiple prediction methods with significance estimation and 3D validation improves reliability and is valuable for protein function prediction.