Central venous catheter infections treated with teicoplanin

A novel way of using teicoplanin in situ to treat central venous catheters is described. Profound immunosuppression and the fact that the lines remain indwelling for long periods are two of the main reasons for these infections. In children it is also difficult to prevent these lines being played with, which increases the likelihood of infection. The different types of infection that can occur in a central venous catheter are described and the clinical definition of a catheter infection is provided. In an initial study, infective episodes in a small group of 11 children were treated successfully with in situ amikacin. Most pathogens were Gram-negative cocci. None of the catheters had to be removed, and catheter life was prolonged by a mean of 118 d. Due to the high incidence of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the initial study, in situ teicoplanin was assessed in a subsequent study. Over the course of 1 yr, 20 line infections occurred in 12 children. Empirical amikacin therapy was instituted and switched to teicoplanin once the pathogen was confirmed as Gram-positive. An antibiotic-heparin mixture was introduced into the line and left in place for 24 h, after which time it was replaced with fresh mixture until cultures were sterile. All pathogens were sensitive to teicoplanin, all infections were treated successfully and no catheters had to be removed. Overall, catheter life was prolonged by a mean of 136 d. It was concluded that in situ teicoplanin was effective and well tolerated for line infections (no side-effects were reported during the study). A minimum of 6 d therapy was recommended. The patients with less severe infections would have been suitable for treatment at home by their parents, district nurse or general practitioner (GP).