Related Experiment Videos
2-HEMA-free dentin bonding system to prevent contraction gap
1Department of Operative Dentistry, Showa University, School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
Dental Materials Journal
|July 15, 1998
Summary
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) is not essential in dental primers or bonding agents. Alternative priming methods effectively prevent gaps, suggesting 2-HEMA
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Polymer Chemistry
- Adhesive Dentistry
Background:
- 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) is a common component in dental primers and bonding agents.
- Understanding its role is crucial for optimizing dentin bonding systems and minimizing adverse effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of 2-HEMA in primers and dentin bonding agents on the efficacy of dentin bonding systems.
- To assess the formation of polymerization contraction gaps in resin composite restorations.
Main Methods:
- A commercial resin composite was restored in human molar dentin cavities.
- Polymerization contraction gap width was measured.
- Different priming strategies involving EDTA-conditioning and various monomers (including 2-HEMA) were tested.
Main Results:
- Gap formation was prevented with EDTA-conditioning followed by glyceryl mono-methacrylate, ethylene glycol, and 1,6-hexanediol priming, irrespective of 2-HEMA content in the bonding agent.
- 2-HEMA priming alone did not completely prevent gap formation.
- 2-HEMA demonstrated low bonding efficacy and potential for delayed allergic skin reactions.
Conclusions:
- 2-HEMA is not essential in either the primer or the dentin bonding agent for effective dentin bonding.
- Alternative priming solutions offer superior gap prevention.
- The use of 2-HEMA should be reconsidered due to its limited efficacy and adverse side effects.