Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
Published on: July 25, 2013
Mode matches in hydrophobic free energy eigenfunctions predict peptide-protein interactions
A J Mandell1, M J Owens, K A Selz
1Cielo Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Abstract:
The dominant statistical hydrophobic free energy inverse frequencies amino acid wavelengths as hydrophobic modes, of neurotensin (NT), cholescystokinin (CCK), the human dopamine D2 receptor [(DA)D2], and the human dopamine transporter (DAT) were determined using orthogonal decomposition of the autocovariance matrices of their amino acid sequences as hydrophobic free energy equivalents in kcal/mol. The leading eigenvalues-associated eigenvectors were convolved with the original series to construct eigenfunctions. Eigenfunctions were further analyzed using discrete trigonometric wavelet and all poles, maximum entropy power spectral transformations. This yielded clean representations of the dominant hydrophobic free energy modes, most of which are otherwise lost in the smoothing of hydropathy plots or contaminated by end effects and multimodality in conventional Fourier transformations. Mode matches were found between NT and (DA)D2 and between CCK and DAT, but not the converse. These mode matches successfully predicted the nonlinear kinetic interactions of NT-(DA)D2 in contrast with CCK-(DA) D2 on 3H-spiperone binding to (DA) D2, and by CCK-DAT but not NT-DAT on [N-methyl-3H]-WIN 35,428 binding to DAT in (DA)D2 and DAT cDNA stably transfected cell lines without known NT or CCK receptors. Computation of the dominant modes of hydrophobic free energy eigenfunctions may help predict functionally relevant peptide-membrane protein interactions, even across neurotransmitter families.
More Related Videos
06:50Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...