Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Child pedestrians' crossing gap thresholds

M L Connelly1, H M Conaglen, B S Parsonson

  • 1University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|July 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The safety of anaesthetising biochemically hyperthyroid patients undergoing thyroidectomy-a retrospective cohort study.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2018
Same author

Duration of cortisol suppression following a single dose of dexamethasone in healthy volunteers: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2013
Same author

The effect of high dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy on men's health-related quality of life and sexual function over a 2 year time span.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2012
Same author

An investigation of sexual dysfunction in female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: how interviews expand on questionnaire responses.

International journal of impotence research·2010
Same author

Burnout in physicians: a case for peer-support.

Internal medicine journal·2005
Same author

A prospective study of the psychological impact on patients of first diagnosis of human papillomavirus.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2001
Same journal

Differential sensitivity of self-reported driving and collision measures to aspects of shiftwork, sleep, and fatigue.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Delving into the visual attention of pedestrians during street crossing under time pressure: An eye-tracking approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Differentiating high-frequency and high-severity hotspots: A robust risk-evolution-volume (REV) framework.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Modeling takeover decisions in driving automation: a multilevel drift-diffusion model (MDDM) framework integrating human, system, and environmental factors.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

The state-dependent causal effect of a V2X-based beyond-line-of-sight warning system on young driver response: a causal machine learning approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

How conservative driving behavior increases crash risk: Understanding the systemic safety impacts of older drivers in mixed traffic flows.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
See all related articles

Young children struggle to judge safe gaps in traffic. Even older children may misjudge gaps at speeds over 60 kph, highlighting risks in child pedestrian safety.

Area of Science:

  • Pedestrian Safety
  • Child Development
  • Traffic Psychology

Background:

  • Assessing children's ability to judge traffic gaps is crucial for developing effective safety strategies.
  • Previous research indicates age-related differences in pedestrian decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how children of different age groups judge the safety of crossing urban streets.
  • To determine the relationship between traffic speed, gap distance, and children's crossing decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Three age groups of children (5-6, 8-9, 11-12 years) performed roadside trials assessing traffic gap judgement.
  • Vehicle speeds and distances were measured using laser technology.
  • Children judged the minimum safe gap to cross a 12-m street.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Distance gap thresholds remained constant across different vehicle speeds.
  • Older children (11-12 years) showed safer judgements than younger groups (5-6, 8-9 years) at speeds up to 60 kph.
  • Using distance as a primary strategy was the least effective for safe gap judgement.

Conclusions:

  • Children's ability to judge safe traffic gaps is limited, particularly for younger age groups and at higher speeds.
  • Current pedestrian safety strategies may need refinement to address age-specific decision-making limitations.
  • Future interventions should focus on improving children's understanding of traffic dynamics and safe crossing behaviors.