Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Coronary revascularization in the treatment of moderate and severe postischemic left ventricular dysfunction
F Fath-Ordoubadi1, D Pagano, N V Marinho
1MRC Cyclotron Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
Coronary revascularization significantly improves left ventricular (LV) function in patients with severe LV dysfunction and viable myocardium. The severity of LV dysfunction impacts the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting myocardial viability.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Chronic postischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction can improve after coronary revascularization, a phenomenon known as hibernating myocardium.
- The relationship between the severity of LV dysfunction and functional outcomes post-revascularization, as well as the accuracy of viability tests, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the severity of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction influences functional recovery after coronary revascularization.
- To assess the impact of LV dysfunction severity on the predictive accuracy of (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for myocardial viability.
Main Methods:
- Studied 47 patients with coronary artery disease and chronic LV dysfunction.
- Assessed myocardial viability using FDG-PET during a hyperinsulinemic clamp before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Evaluated global and regional LV function (ejection fraction and wall motion score) before and 4-6 months after CABG.
- Divided patients into moderate (EF > 30%) and severe (EF ≤ 30%) LV dysfunction groups.
Main Results:
- Patients with severe LV dysfunction (Group 1) showed significant improvement in ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion score (WMS) post-CABG (p < 0.0001).
- Patients with moderate LV dysfunction (Group 2) had no significant change in EF post-CABG, although WMS tended to improve (p = 0.09).
- Severe dysfunction group had a higher proportion of dysfunctional segments and higher FDG uptake, indicating more hibernating myocardium.
- Baseline EF affected PET's predictive accuracy: highest positive predictive accuracy in Group 2, highest negative predictive accuracy in Group 1.
Conclusions:
- Coronary revascularization offers the greatest potential benefit for patients with severe LV dysfunction, provided there is evidence of myocardial viability.
- The degree of left ventricular dysfunction significantly influences the predictive accuracy of myocardial viability studies like FDG-PET.
Abstract:
Chronic postischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction can improve following coronary revascularization (hibernating myocardium). However, it is not clear whether the severity of LV dysfunction determines functional outcome after revascularization and the accuracy of tests to predict myocardial viability. We studied 47 patients with coronary artery disease and chronic LV dysfunction. Before coronary bypass, patients underwent (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp to assess viability. Global and regional LV function were assessed before and 4 to 6 months after surgery. Patients were arbitrarily divided into 2 groups with moderate and severe LV dysfunction. Group 1 (n = 26) had an ejection fraction (EF) of < or = 30% and group 2 (n = 21) > 30%. After bypass, the EF (22+/-6% vs 31+/-10%; p <0.0001) and global wall motion score (WMS) (2.05+/-0.39 vs 1.56+/-0.34; p <0.001) improved in group 1, whereas the EF (43+/-9% vs 43+/-12%; p = NS) was unchanged in group 2, although WMS tended to improve (1.42+/-0.38 vs 1.32+/-0.39; p = 0.09). The proportion of dysfunctional segments (72% vs 32%; p <0.0001) and FDG uptake in these segments (0.44+/-0.15 vs 0.34+/-0.15 micromol/g/min, p <0.0001) were greater in group 1 than in group 2. The baseline EF influenced the predictive accuracy of PET, with highest positive predictive accuracy in group 2 and highest negative predictive accuracy in group 1. Thus, coronary revascularization has the potential for greatest benefit in patients with the most severe dysfunction, but with evidence of viability, and the entity of LV dysfunction affects the predictive accuracy of viability studies.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care