Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contemporary spinal CT applications

B A Johnson1, L N Tanenbaum

  • 1Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416, USA.

Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
|July 23, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neonatal video review practices across the US: capturing utilization and barriers.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
Same author

Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with COHERENT's Germanium Array.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

CPT Codes for Quantitative MRI of the Brain: What It Means for Neuroradiology.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2024
Same author

Scintillation characteristics of the EJ-299-02H scintillator.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same author

Measurement of Electron-Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on ^{127}I with the COHERENT NaIνE Detector.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Deep Learning-Generated Synthetic MR Imaging STIR Spine Images Are Superior in Image Quality and Diagnostically Equivalent to Conventional STIR: A Multicenter, Multireader Trial.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same journal

State-of-the-Art Epilepsy Imaging: Improving Tools for Epileptogenic Lesion Detection and Treatment.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging of Epilepsy.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Implanted Devices for Management of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Background and MR Imaging Considerations.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging of Epilepsy Surgery, Minimally Invasive Techniques, and Neuromodulation.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Neuroimaging and the Epilepsy Journey.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Epilepsy.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Computed tomography (CT) is crucial for evaluating spinal disorders, excelling in bone abnormality and calcification assessment. Technological advancements improve CT capabilities, offering new data rendering options for spinal disease diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Spinal Diagnostics

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is widely available.
  • Computed tomography (CT) is essential for evaluating spinal disorders.
  • CT offers superior assessment of bone abnormalities and calcification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the continued importance of CT in spinal imaging.
  • To discuss technological advancements in CT for spinal evaluation.
  • To compare CT and MR imaging for diagnosing spinal diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Review of CT and MR imaging capabilities for spinal disorders.
  • Discussion of technological enhancements in CT data rendering and display.
  • Analysis of clinical indications for choosing CT or MR.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • CT provides superior visualization of bone abnormalities and calcification in the spine.
  • Technological advances have significantly improved CT's data rendering and display options.
  • The choice between CT and MR depends on specific clinical indications.

Conclusions:

  • CT remains a vital imaging modality for spinal disorders, particularly for bone assessment.
  • Advancements in CT technology offer enhanced diagnostic capabilities.
  • Both CT and MR imaging play crucial roles, with the choice determined by clinical context.