Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient participation in decision-making

E Guadagnoli1, P Ward

  • 1Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|July 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Applying Social Practice Theory to Explore Australian Preschool Children's Oral Health.

JDR clinical and translational research·2024
Same author

Quantifying hospital environmental ventilation using carbon dioxide monitoring - a multicentre study.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods in Agenda 2030.

EcoHealth·2022
Same author

Question time.

British dental journal·2020
Same author

Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2020
Same author

The potential role of Antarctic krill faecal pellets in efficient carbon export at the marginal ice zone of the South Orkney Islands in spring.

Polar biology·2020
Same journal

Escaping in-work poverty and mental health: A longitudinal study of Swedish workers.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Intersecting social positions and mental wellbeing in adolescence: A population-based study.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Hate crimes hurt: State-level hate crime rates and racial health disparities.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Toward a typology of government-sanctioned child maltreatment: A scoping review of the harms of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of women in the slums of Guwahati city (Assam, India): A qualitative analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Patients desire involvement in treatment decisions when multiple options exist. While research benefits are unclear due to study limitations, patient participation is ethically justified and should be encouraged by physicians.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Psychology
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Patient autonomy is a growing consideration in healthcare.
  • The extent and benefits of patient involvement in treatment decisions remain debated.
  • Existing research on participation benefits faces methodological challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence supporting and opposing patient participation in treatment decision-making.
  • To identify patient preferences regarding involvement in medical choices.
  • To propose future research directions for evaluating and enhancing patient engagement.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature on patient participation in decision-making.
  • Analysis of studies examining patient preferences for involvement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of methodological limitations in current research.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients generally wish to be informed about treatment alternatives.
    • Patients prefer to be involved in decisions when multiple effective options are available.
    • Current research has not definitively demonstrated the benefits of patient participation due to methodological issues.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient participation in decision-making is ethically warranted, irrespective of proven benefits.
    • Physicians should actively engage patients in decision-making processes when viable treatment alternatives exist.
    • Developing methods to assess patient readiness for participation and tailored interventions is recommended.