Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Animal models for dysmorphology

R M Winter1

  • 1Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK. rwinter@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
|August 5, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European Cytogeneticists Association Register of Unbalanced Chromosome Aberrations (ECARUCA); an online database for rare chromosome abnormalities.

European journal of medical genetics·2006
Same author

Kohlschutter syndrome in siblings.

Clinical dysmorphology·2005
Same author

Diagnosis in dysmorphology: clues from the skin.

The British journal of dermatology·2004
Same author

Congenital glaucoma and brain stem atrophy as features of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2004
Same author

Familial syndromic duodenal atresia: Feingold syndrome.

European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie·2004
Same author

Characterization of brain malformations in the Baraitser-Winter syndrome and review of the literature.

Neuropediatrics·2003
Same journal

Temporal trajectories underlying adult neuronal diversity.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Shared molecular and cellular programs during regeneration of glandular epithelia.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing in human cortical development.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Cis-regulatory strategies in developmental patterning.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

GABAergic neuron fate specification and lineage allocation: from development to disorder.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
See all related articles

This article reviews how using animals in research helps scientists understand human birth defects. By studying genetic processes and creating models of known conditions, researchers gain insights into the pathways that cause malformation syndromes.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental biology and dysmorphology research
  • Genetics and animal models of human disease

Background:

No prior work has fully resolved how specific genetic mechanisms contribute to human developmental disorders. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate various biological systems for answers. It was already known that certain developmental processes are shared across species. This gap motivated scientists to look at non-human subjects for clarity. Prior research has shown that complex inheritance patterns often influence physical growth. Understanding these patterns requires controlled environments that are difficult to achieve in human populations. This study addresses the need for better experimental frameworks in developmental genetics. The field relies on these systems to bridge the gap between genotype and phenotype.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of animal models in understanding human malformation syndromes. Researchers seek to determine how these systems contribute to the dissection of complex genetic mechanisms. The study addresses the need to clarify how imprinting influences developmental outcomes. It explores how creating replicas of known human conditions aids in identifying underlying causes. The motivation stems from the desire to link gene families and pathways to specific physical traits. This work examines how these models provide necessary clues for clinical research. The authors intend to synthesize existing evidence to highlight the utility of these experimental tools. They focus on how these approaches improve our grasp of human developmental disorders.

Keywords:
birth defectsdevelopmental biologyhereditary conditionsphenotype mapping

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that these systems allow for the dissection of complex genetic mechanisms, such as imprinting. By creating replicas of known human conditions, scientists can observe how specific gene families and pathways influence the development of malformation syndromes in a controlled environment.

The authors identify gene families and signaling pathways as key components. These elements are studied to understand how they contribute to the development of physical abnormalities, providing a clearer picture of the genetic architecture behind various human conditions.

The researchers suggest that these models are necessary because they offer a controlled environment for studying complex inheritance patterns. Unlike human populations, these systems allow for precise manipulation of genetic variables, which is required to isolate the effects of specific mutations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Review approach involves synthesizing literature on the utility of non-human subjects in developmental biology. The authors examine how researchers create replicas of known human conditions. They analyze the role of these systems in dissecting complex inheritance patterns. The investigation focuses on how scientists identify gene families and signaling pathways. This assessment covers various experimental strategies used to link genotypes to physical phenotypes. The team evaluates how these models provide insights into human malformation syndromes. They compare different methodologies for studying imprinting and other genetic mechanisms. This synthesis provides a comprehensive overview of current practices in the field.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature demonstrate that animal systems are vital for understanding complex genetic mechanisms. The evidence shows that these models successfully replicate known human conditions. Researchers have identified specific gene families that contribute to malformation syndromes through these studies. The literature confirms that imprinting is a major area where these models provide clarity. Findings indicate that these systems offer essential clues regarding various signaling pathways. The data suggest that these models bridge the gap between genetic discovery and clinical understanding. Results highlight the effectiveness of using diverse species to study developmental errors. The synthesis shows that these tools are central to modern dysmorphology research.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that animal systems remain essential for dissecting complex genetic mechanisms like imprinting. They propose that these models provide necessary clues regarding specific gene families and signaling pathways. Synthesis and implications indicate that creating replicas of known human conditions improves our grasp of malformation syndromes. The researchers emphasize that these tools help clarify the underlying causes of developmental errors. They argue that the utility of these models extends to identifying broader biological principles. The evidence supports the continued use of diverse species to study human health. Their review highlights how these approaches offer a window into complex developmental processes. The authors conclude that integrating these findings advances our collective knowledge of human dysmorphology.

The authors utilize data regarding known human conditions to inform the creation of these models. This comparative approach allows them to map human genetic findings onto animal systems, thereby validating the relevance of the observed phenotypes to human health.

The researchers measure the success of these models by their ability to replicate human malformation syndromes. This phenomenon is assessed by comparing the phenotypic outcomes in the models to the clinical presentations observed in human patients with similar genetic profiles.

The authors imply that these models are vital for advancing our understanding of human developmental disorders. They suggest that continued investment in these systems will lead to further discoveries regarding the genetic basis of complex malformation syndromes.