Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comments on "Measuring memory for source: Some theoretical assumptions and technical limitations"

L A Henkel1, N Franklin

  • 1Princeton University, New Jersey, USA. lhenkel@unf.edu

Memory & Cognition
|August 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outbreak of hepatitis A genotype IB in Australia associated with imported frozen pomegranate arils.

Epidemiology and infection·2019
Same author

Epidemiology and whole genome sequencing of an ongoing point-source Salmonella Agona outbreak associated with sushi consumption in western Sydney, Australia 2015.

Epidemiology and infection·2017
Same author

Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Should Congress pass a patient-protection law?

Hospitals & health networks·1999
Same author

Retrieval from temporally organized situation models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·1998
Same author

Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·1998
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study addresses critiques of source monitoring research, affirming that identified limitations do not invalidate existing conclusions. It clarifies issues in performance, recognition accuracy, and analytical methods used in source monitoring studies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Critiques of source monitoring research by Murnane and Bayen (1998) question the validity of conclusions drawn from Henkel and Franklin (1998).
  • This response defends the original findings, asserting that the limitations discussed do not invalidate the conclusions.
  • The debate centers on the interpretation of source monitoring performance and related analytical techniques.

Discussion:

  • The authors discuss specific issues concerning conclusions about source monitoring performance.
  • The relationship between recognition memory and source accuracy is examined.
  • The appropriate use of empirical and multinomial analyses in this field is debated.

Key Insights:

  • Limitations in measurement do not inherently invalidate research findings in source monitoring.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The conclusions from Henkel and Franklin (1998) remain robust despite critiques.
  • Clarification is provided on the interpretation of source monitoring data and analytical methods.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research should carefully consider measurement limitations and assumptions in source monitoring.
    • Continued dialogue is needed on the interpretation of empirical and multinomial analyses.
    • This work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of memory and source monitoring.