Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Letter legibility and visual word recognition

T A Nazir1, A M Jacobs, J K O'Regan

  • 1Center for Research in Cognitive Neuroscience (CNRS-CRNC), Marseille, France. nazir@lnf.cnrs.mrs.fr

Memory & Cognition
|August 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advancement of Photospheric Radius Expansion and Clocked Type-I X-Ray Burst Models with the New ^{22}Mg(α,p)^{25}Al Reaction Rate Determined at the Gamow Energy.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Following in Jakobson and Lévi-Strauss' footsteps: A neurocognitive poetics investigation of eye movements during the reading of Baudelaire's 'Les Chats'.

Journal of eye movement research·2021
Same author

Context matters: Anterior and posterior cortical midline responses to sad movie scenes.

Brain research·2016
Same author

What Does It Take for an Infant to Learn How to Use a Tool by Observation?

Frontiers in psychology·2016
Same author

The neural bases of the pseudohomophone effect: Phonological constraints on lexico-semantic access in reading.

Neuroscience·2015
Same author

A negative selection scheme for tobacco protoplast-derived cells expressing the T-DNA gene 2.

Plant cell reports·2013
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

The viewing position effect (VPE) in word recognition shows performance decreases away from an optimal fixation point. Improving letter legibility with magnification does not eliminate this effect, suggesting perceptual learning influences word recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Reading Science

Background:

  • Word recognition performance is influenced by eye fixation location within a word.
  • The viewing position effect (VPE) demonstrates maximal performance slightly left of word center, decreasing with eccentricity.
  • Previous research links VPE exaggeration to reduced letter legibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between letter legibility and the viewing position effect (VPE).
  • To determine if improving letter legibility by proportional magnification mitigates the VPE.
  • To explore the role of perceptual learning in word recognition under varying legibility conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulating letter size proportionally to the distance from the fixation point to enhance legibility across eccentricities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measuring word recognition performance across different viewing positions.
  • Comparing performance with and without enhanced letter legibility.

    • Main Results:

    • Improving letter legibility via magnification had a limited impact on word recognition performance.
    • A significant VPE persisted even when letter legibility was equalized across viewing distances, particularly for longer words.
    • Enhanced legibility did not fully neutralize the VPE, contrary to acuity-limit hypotheses.

    Conclusions:

    • The persistent VPE, even with improved legibility, suggests perceptual learning plays a crucial role.
    • Readers may rely on low-resolution parafoveal information due to learned acuity limitations, hindering the use of enhanced legibility.
    • Findings indicate that reading strategies are adapted to normal acuity constraints and are resistant to changes in peripheral letter quality.