Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk management in blood transfusion services

G Whyte1

  • 1ARCBS-VIC/TAS, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. gwhyte@rcbbv.org.au

Vox Sanguinis
|August 15, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Risk perception significantly impacts public safety decisions, especially concerning blood transfusions. Understanding the public

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A national survey of the provision of prehabilitation for oesophagogastric cancer patients in the UK.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2024
Same author

Exercise During Chemotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Journal of surgical oncology·2024
Same author

'Unable to have a proper conversation over the phone about my concerns': a multimethods evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on routine childhood vaccination services in London, UK.

Public health·2023
Same author

Making a move in exercise referral: co-development of a physical activity referral scheme.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2018
Same author

Image-based closed-loop feedback for highly mono-dispersed microdroplet production.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2016

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Risk is often oversimplified as mere probability of adverse outcomes, neglecting perception.
  • The intuitive benchmark for risk is 1 in a million (10^-6), representing background mortality.
  • In Australia, transfusion-transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) risks approximate 10^-6.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the multifaceted nature of risk in blood transfusion safety.
  • To highlight the discrepancy between statistical risk and public perception of harm.
  • To inform blood service professionals on integrating social and political factors into risk management.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of transfusion-transmitted infection risks (HIV, HCV, HBV, HTLV1).
  • Evaluation of mortality rates associated with these infections.
  • Consideration of public perception and catastrophic event aversion.

Main Results:

  • While HIV and HCV transmission risks are around 10^-6, Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) risk is higher, and Human T-lymphotropic Virus type 1 (HTLV1) risk is lower.
  • The risk of death from these transfusion-transmitted infections is considerably lower than the transmission probability, especially for HTLV1.
  • Public perception of risk, particularly the fear of catastrophic events, disproportionately influences attitudes towards transfusion safety.

Conclusions:

  • Blood transfusion risk assessment must incorporate public perception and socio-political context.
  • Statistical probabilities alone are insufficient for effective risk communication and management in blood services.
  • Professionals must balance scientific data with public anxieties to ensure trust and safety.

Related Experiment Videos