Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Encoding features of complex and unfamiliar objects

V Modigliani, D S Loverock, S R Kirson

    The American Journal of Psychology
    |August 15, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Attention and size in a global/local task.

    Acta psychologica·2001
    Same author

    Inattention and the perception of visual feature conjunctions.

    Acta psychologica·1996
    Same author

    Lateral masking as a determinant of global dominance.

    Perception·1992
    Same author

    The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children.

    Memory & cognition·1987
    Same author

    Stimulus generalization and the peak shift with movement stimuli.

    Journal of motor behavior·1983
    Same author

    On the conservation of simple concepts: generality of the affirmation rule.

    Journal of experimental psychology·1971
    Same journal

    Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

    The American journal of psychology·2021
    Same journal

    Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    This study shows that people are less likely to notice details on complex objects when those details are less prominent. However, focused attention can improve feature acquisition, even for subtle features.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive psychology
    • Visual perception
    • Human attention

    Background:

    • Understanding how individuals acquire features from complex stimuli is crucial in cognitive psychology.
    • The principle of top-down encoding suggests a relationship between feature level and processing time/recognition accuracy.
    • Previous research has not fully elucidated the role of attention and task demands in feature acquisition.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the acquisition of features from complex, unfamiliar objects.
    • To test the hypothesis that processing time and recognition decrease as feature level decreases.
    • To examine the influence of attention and task demands on top-down encoding.

    Main Methods:

    • Four experiments were conducted using visual stimuli.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed tasks involving feature detection and recognition of complex objects.
  • Experimental manipulations included varying feature levels, providing explicit instructions, and controlling for potential confounds like size and interference.

    • Main Results:

    • Results supported the top-down encoding principle: increased time and decreased recognition were observed with lower feature levels.
    • Retroactive interference was ruled out as an explanation.
    • Explicit instructions to attend to relevant features altered top-down encoding, and size was not a determining factor.
    • Task demands influenced feature encoding, confirming the top-down principle's applicability.

    Conclusions:

    • Feature acquisition from complex objects is generally inversely related to the feature's structural level under normal attention.
    • Top-down encoding processes are malleable and can be influenced by attentional focus and explicit instructions.
    • These findings have implications for understanding visual perception and information processing in various contexts.