Related Experiment Videos
Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence
Issues in Law & Medicine
|August 26, 1998
Abstract:
Partial-birth abortion bans patterned after the federal bill passed by both houses of Congress are constitutional. The clear legislative definition can be easily distinguished from other abortion procedures. Abortion precedents do not apply to such bans because the abortion right pertains to unborn human beings, not to those partially delivered. Such bans are also rationally-related to legitimate state interests. Even if abortion jurisprudence is deemed to apply in the partial-birth abortion context, a ban is still constitutional under Casey because a ban on partial-birth abortions does not impose an undue burden on the abortion right.
Keywords:
American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsAmerican Medical AssociationEvans v. KelleyGenetics and ReproductionLegal ApproachPartial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (1995 bill)Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. CaseyRoe v. WadeU.S. CongressAbortion LawAbortion, Induced--legal aspectsAge FactorsAmericasDelivery--legal aspectsDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesEthicsFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostconceptionHuman RightsInfantJurisprudenceLegislationNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaPopulationPopulation CharacteristicsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomesReproductionUnited StatesYouth