Related Experiment Videos
Active or passive chest drainage after oesophagectomy in 101 patients: a prospective randomized study
J Johansson1, C G Lindberg, F Johnsson
1Department of Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.
Background:
This study evaluates the efficiency and safety of two methods of chest drainage after uncomplicated oesophagectomy.
Methods:
A prospective randomized study between active suction drainage and passive chest drainage was carried out in 101 patients who underwent gastric pull-up oesophagectomy.
Results:
No difference in the prevalence of pneumothorax during treatment was noted between the active (nine of 55) and the passive (four of 46) drainage groups (P=0.20). Nor was there any difference in the size (P=0.46) and duration (P=0.53) of the pneumothorax. There was no significant difference in right (P=0.84) and left (P=0.61) basal atelectases and the amounts of right (P=0.10) and left (P=0.24) pleural effusions. There were significantly more basal atelectases (P < 0.001) and pleural effusions (P<0.001) in the non-operated left side compared with the operated right side. Postoperative hospital stay was the same in both groups (median 13 days; P=0.86). The hospital mortality rate was two of 101, and was not affected by the type of drainage.
Conclusion:
Passive drainage did not reduce hospital stay, but was as safe and effective as the active system in draining the pleural cavity after uncomplicated oesophagectomy.