Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Random errors in anthropometry

M Kouchi1, M Mochimaru, K Tsuzuki

  • 1Human-Environment System Department, National Institute of Bioscience and Human-Technology, Ibaraki, Japan.

Journal of Human Ergology
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analyses of COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction and classical post-viral olfactory dysfunction: a multicenter retrospective study.

Rhinology·2026
Same author

Assessing parosmia patients: a study on the evaluation method using a self-administered odor questionnaire for parosmia.

Rhinology·2024
Same author

Olfactory and taste dysfunctions caused by COVID-19: a nationwide study.

Rhinology·2023
Same author

Therapeutic indications for sinonasal topical steroid treatment and its effects on eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing tooth extraction: oral surgeon and otolaryngologist viewpoints and appropriate management.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2020
Same author

Predictors of disease progression after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2019
Same journal

DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF WORK EXPOSURE WHILE SITTING IN A SQUATTING POSITION TO AVOID LOW BACK PAIN: A SIMULATION STUDY.

Journal of human ergology·2018
Same journal

COMFORT FROM HEARING PROTECTORS.

Journal of human ergology·2018
Same journal

STRIAING FOR MUDERNILED BALINESE MEITICS (GEGULAA).

Journal of human ergology·2018
Same journal

SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF DIVERSE SOUNDS ON HEART RATE VARIABILITY.

Journal of human ergology·2016
Same journal

PULMONARY FUNCTION STUDIES IN FEMALE SINGERS OF KOLKATA, INDIA.

Journal of human ergology·2016
Same journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL STRAIN AMONG WOMEN POTATO CULTIVATORS IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA.

Journal of human ergology·2016
See all related articles

This study quantifies random error in anthropometry, finding larger measurements generally have lower relative error and higher reliability. Human body imprecision contributes to measurement variability.

Area of Science:

  • Anthropometry
  • Human biology
  • Measurement science

Background:

  • Anthropometry is crucial for various fields, but random error can affect measurement accuracy.
  • Understanding the magnitude and sources of this error is essential for reliable data collection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the magnitude and variance of random error in anthropometric measurements.
  • To investigate the precision and reliability of 219 anthropometric measurement items.
  • To explore factors influencing measurement error and reliability.

Main Methods:

  • 219 anthropometric measurements were taken on 12 subjects by the same observer on two separate occasions.
  • Precision was assessed using mean absolute difference (MAD) and technical error of measurement (TEM).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reliability was quantified using the reliability coefficient (R), representing error-free variance.

    • Main Results:

    • MAD and TEM are highly correlated, both indicating the magnitude of random error.
    • R is not correlated with MAD or TEM, reflecting the proportion of variance free from error.
    • Larger measurements (1-10 cm) showed absolutely larger but relatively smaller random errors and higher reliability.
    • Factors like small size, difficult landmarks, soft tissue deformation, and posture inconsistency contribute to imprecision.

    Conclusions:

    • Random error is inherent in anthropometry due to the non-rigid nature of the human body.
    • Measurement size influences error magnitude and reliability, with larger measurements generally being more reliable.
    • Understanding these error characteristics is vital for improving anthropometric data accuracy.