Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Domain structural class prediction
1Computer-Aided Drug Discovery, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI 49007-4940, USA.
Abstract:
The structural class of a protein domain can be approximately predicted according to its amino acid composition. However, can the prediction quality be improved by taking into account the coupling effect among different amino acid components? This question has evoked much controversy because completely different conclusions have been obtained by different investigators. To resolve such a perplexing problem, predictions by means of various algorithms were performed based on the SCOP database (Murzin et aL, 1995), which is more natural and reliable for the study of structural classes because it is based on evolutionary relationships and on the principles that govern their three-dimensional structure. The results obtained using both resubstitution and jackknife tests indicated that the overall rates of correct prediction by an algorithm incorporating the coupling effect among different amino acid components were significantly higher than those by the algorithms that did not include such an effect. A completely consistent conclusion was also obtained when tests were performed on two large independent testing datasets classified into four and seven structural classes, respectively. It is revealed through an analysis that the reasons for reaching the opposite conclusion are mainly due to (1) misclassifying structural classes according to a conceptually incorrect rule, (2) misapplying the component-coupled algorithm by ignoring some important factors and (3) misrepresenting structural classes with statistically insignificant training subsets. Clarification of these problems would be instructive for effectively using the prediction algorithm and correctly interpreting the results.
More Related Videos
08:04Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The long...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Stability of structures
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as: