Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The false-negative mammogram

P T Huynh1, A M Jarolimek, S Daye

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77030, USA.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|September 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of G protein and cGMP on phytochrome-mediated amaranthin synthesis inAmaranthus caudatus seedlings.

Science in China. Series C, Life sciences·2008
Same author

The use of telemedicine for real-time video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care: preliminary results.

The Journal of trauma·2001
Same author

Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: correlates of anxiety.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2000
Same author

Evaluation of the quality of self-education mammography material available for patients on the Internet.

Academic radiology·2000
Same author

Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000
Same journal

MRI of Lesions Growing Along the Pituitary Stalk.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Are We Up for the Challenge?

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Radiology Board Examinations: A Fundamental Shift.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Early Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Implications, Workup, and Imaging Findings with Histopathologic Correlation for Personalized Surveillance.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Approach to Prostate Cancer Metastasis Mimics at Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
See all related articles

Understanding breast cancer detection failures is key. Four factors cause missed breast cancers: mammography limitations, poor technique, subtle lesion features, and interpretation errors, all impacting diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Failure to detect or characterize breast cancer accurately can stem from several sources.
  • Screen-film mammography has inherent limitations, particularly with dense breast tissue.
  • Inadequate technique and subtle lesion characteristics also contribute to diagnostic challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and categorize the primary factors contributing to false-negative mammograms.
  • To highlight areas for improvement in mammographic screening and interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common causes for missed breast cancer detection in mammography.
  • Analysis of technical and interpretative factors influencing diagnostic accuracy.
  • Categorization of errors into mammography limitations, technique, lesion characteristics, and interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Four main factors contribute to missed breast cancers: screen-film mammography's inherent limitations (e.g., contrast in dense tissue), inadequate radiographic technique (positioning, compression, exposure), subtle or unusual lesion characteristics (size, location, appearance), and interpretation errors (viewing conditions, systematic approach, knowledge gaps).
  • Poor radiographic technique is an avoidable factor.
  • Subtle lesion features and interpretation errors present significant challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Recognizing the limitations of screen-film mammography, the importance of optimal radiographic technique, understanding challenging lesion presentations, and addressing interpretation pitfalls are crucial.
  • Implementing improvements in these areas can help reduce the rate of false-negative mammograms and improve breast cancer detection outcomes.