Related Experiment Videos
Screening for suicidal ideation in children and adolescents: methodological considerations
1Section on Developmental Psychopathology, NIMH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Journal of Adolescence
|October 3, 1998
Summary
Reporting methods significantly impact youth suicidality prevalence. Discrepancies between child and maternal reports were noted, especially in at-risk groups, affecting data accuracy for child mental health assessments.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Mental Health Research
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Suicidal ideation and attempts in youth show variable prevalence based on reporting source, recall period, and assessment method.
- Methodological considerations are crucial for accurate suicidality screening in children and adolescents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine methodological issues in administering suicidal screening measures to children and adolescents.
- To investigate how reporter (child vs. mother), retrospection, and assessment type influence youth suicidality prevalence estimates.
Main Methods:
- Study involved 192 siblings from families with depressed mothers (risk group) and mothers without psychiatric diagnoses (comparison group).
- Suicidality screening utilized structured diagnostic interviews with youth, youth self-reports, and maternal reports across multiple child age points.
- Assessments were conducted longitudinally as children aged.
Main Results:
- Mothers reported lower youth suicidality prevalence than youth did; discrepancies were more common in the risk group.
- Lifetime retrospection yielded lower prevalence than 3-year interval assessments.
- Self-report prevalence (7-13%) was higher than interview-based assessments.
Conclusions:
- The method of assessing youth suicidality significantly influences reported prevalence rates.
- Discrepancies in reporting between children and mothers, particularly in at-risk populations, highlight the complexity of accurate assessment.
- Child and maternal characteristics correlate with reporting consistency and discrepancies, underscoring the need for nuanced interpretation of suicidality data.