Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ad libitum mixing in a taste memory task: methodological issues

M Vanne1, P Laurinen, H Tuorila

  • 1Department of Food Technology, University of Helsinki, Finland. mika.vanne@helsinki.fi

Chemical Senses
|October 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sweet taste exposure and the subsequent acceptance and preference for sweet taste in the diet: systematic review of the published literature.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2018
Same author

Application of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities in patients with olfactory impairment.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2015
Same author

Intestinal morphology and enzymatic activity in newly weaned pigs fed contrasting fiber concentrations and fiber properties.

Journal of animal science·2006
Same author

Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales.

Appetite·2004
Same author

Timing of intensity perception of a polar vs nonpolar aroma compound in the presence of added vegetable fat in milk.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2003
Same author

Flavor enhancement as a tool for increasing pleasantness and intake of a snack product among the elderly.

Appetite·2003
Same journal

A method for assessing approach and avoidance behavior across multiple olfactory stimuli in mice including multivariate hypothesis comparisons.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

From Receptors to Behavior: Molecular and Functional Logic of Sensory Coding in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory System.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Vomeronasal sensory input and its social behavioral output.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Reference data for Bayesian adaptive QUEST-based taste recognitions thresholds from pooled individual participant data.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Expression of Calca gene-derived peptides in the murine taste system.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

The trigeminal function questionnaire (TriFunQ): a tool for clinical and research use.

Chemical senses·2026
See all related articles

Ad libitum mixing effectively measures taste memory, with recall accuracy unaffected by mixing direction or training repetitions. Performance remained consistent across different study designs and prefill concentrations.

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Sensory Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Taste memory research relies on accurate methods for recalling sensory information.
  • The method of adjustment, specifically ad libitum mixing, is a potential tool for taste memory studies.
  • Understanding factors influencing ad libitum mixing accuracy is crucial for its application in taste memory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate ad libitum mixing as a method for taste memory research.
  • To investigate the impact of ascending versus descending mixing runs on taste recall.
  • To determine the effect of training (number of replications) on the accuracy of taste reproduction.

Main Methods:

  • Ad libitum mixing was employed to assess taste memory.
  • Ascending and descending mixing runs were compared using various prefill concentrations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subject training was varied by using two or ten replications in initial sessions.

    • Main Results:

    • Reproduced concentrations were higher after a 25-hour interval compared to immediate recall, consistent with prior findings.
    • No significant difference was found between ascending and descending mixing runs, indicating prefill concentrations did not influence reproduction.
    • While no significant difference emerged between two and ten replications, a trend towards improved performance was noted after ten replications with a 25-hour delay.

    Conclusions:

    • Ad libitum mixing is a viable method for taste memory research, showing consistent results across different study designs.
    • The direction of mixing runs and prefill concentrations do not appear to affect the accuracy of reproducing a taste standard.
    • Limited training (two replications) is sufficient for ad libitum mixing, though increased training may offer slight benefits for long-term taste memory.