Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
What to consider when conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis in a clinical setting
M Naglak1, D C Mitchell, P Kris-Etherton
1Department of Health, West Chester University, Pa., USA.
Diet therapy alone is more cost-effective for lowering cholesterol initially than medication plus diet. However, medication plus diet becomes more cost-effective long-term for managing hypercholesterolemia.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Health Economics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Evidence for the cost-effectiveness of nutrition services is limited.
- Economic evaluations like cost-effectiveness analyses are valuable practice-based research.
- Hypercholesterolemia management requires evaluating treatment cost-effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering medications plus diet therapy versus diet therapy alone for hypercholesterolemia.
- To evaluate the economic impact of different treatment approaches in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted on 25 adults with hypercholesterolemia.
- Participants were divided into two groups: medication plus diet (n=13) and diet alone (n=12).
- Data on diet, cost, and laboratory values (including LDL-C) were collected at baseline, 9 months, and 19 months.
Main Results:
- The diet-alone group showed smaller dietary intake changes than the medication + diet group.
- At 9 months, diet alone was more cost-effective per unit change in total cholesterol and LDL-C.
- At follow-up (19 months), medication + diet became more cost-effective per unit change in LDL-C due to greater LDL-C reduction.
Conclusions:
- Initial cost-effectiveness favors diet alone, but medication plus diet shows greater long-term cost-effectiveness for LDL-C reduction.
- Factors influencing cost-effectiveness analysis of medical nutrition therapy include intervention effectiveness, sample size, costs, and follow-up.
- Further research is needed to establish robust evidence on the cost-effectiveness of nutrition services.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...