Related Experiment Videos
Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17
F Sengpiel1, R J Baddeley, T C Freeman
1University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, UK. franks@neuro.mpg.de
Vision Research
|November 3, 1998
Summary
Suppressing visual signals in the brain (V1) involves distinct mechanisms. Contrast-gain control dominates for cross-orientation inhibition, while response-gain control is key for surround and interocular suppression.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Visual Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- A unified mechanism for visual suppression in the primary visual cortex (V1) has been proposed, suggesting inhibition strength depends on stimulus contrast, not cell firing rate.
- This hypothesis posits that inhibitory neuron pools with diverse stimulus specificities mediate all suppressive phenomena.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis of a single inhibitory mechanism in V1 by examining different types of visual suppression.
- To differentiate the effects of cross-orientation, surround, and interocular inhibition on neuronal contrast-response functions (CRFs).
Main Methods:
- Neurons in cat V1 were measured for their contrast-response functions (CRFs).
- Inhibition was induced by superimposed orthogonal gratings (cross-orientation), surrounding iso-oriented gratings (surround), and orthogonal gratings in the other eye (interocular).
- Hyperbolic ratio functions were fitted to quantify the effects on CRFs.
Main Results:
- Cross-orientation inhibition primarily caused 'contrast-gain control' (rightward CRF shift).
- Surround and interocular suppression mainly induced 'response-gain control' (downward CRF shift), with a component of contrast-gain control also observed.
- Layer 4 predominantly showed response-gain control, while layers 2/3, 5, and 6 mainly exhibited contrast-gain control.
- Surround gratings could enhance responses to low-contrast stimuli, effectively lowering detection thresholds.
Conclusions:
- Visual suppression in V1 is not mediated by a single mechanism; distinct gain control modes exist.
- The type of gain control (contrast vs. response) and its laminar distribution differ between suppression types.
- Surround inhibition exhibits complex effects, potentially improving sensitivity to low-contrast stimuli.