Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Professional misconduct: the Bristol case

S N Bolsin1

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Geelong Hospital, Vic. steveb@gh.vic.gov.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|November 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of competence: achievable goal or 'holy grail'?

British journal of anaesthesia·2015
Same author

β-Blockers and cardiac protection.

British journal of anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Critical incident reporting and learning.

British journal of anaesthesia·2010
Same author

Fiduciary disclosure of medical mistakes: the duty to promptly notify patients of adverse health care events.

Journal of law and medicine·2005
Same author

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram of the coronary ostia.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2001
Same author

Effect of i.v. furosemide on pelvic urinary oxygen tension in humans.

British journal of anaesthesia·2000
Same journal

Responding to the Revised First Nations Health and Cultural Safety Accreditation Standards in Australian Primary Medical Education: Institutional Principles and Qualities for Meaningful Progress.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Multimorbidity Clusters Among People Aged 65 Years and Over in Australia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Data Linkage Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Reducing Nitrous Oxide Emissions Across the Melbourne Biomedical Precinct.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Striving for Racial Equity in Oral Cancer Research: A Case Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

A whistleblower exposed serious professional misconduct by three Bristol Royal Infirmary doctors. Their operations led to 29 deaths and brain damage in children, with high mortality rates and undisclosed risks.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Surgical Accountability
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • The Bristol Royal Infirmary case involved serious professional misconduct allegations against three senior medical practitioners.
  • The case centered on 53 pediatric cardiac operations performed between 1988 and 1995, resulting in 29 deaths and four children with brain damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the professional misconduct case concerning pediatric cardiac surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary.
  • To highlight the role of a whistleblower in initiating a six-year investigation into surgical outcomes and communication.

Main Methods:

  • The Professional Conduct Committee of the General Medical Council conducted an eight-month hearing, reviewing 65 days of evidence.
  • Allegations included performing high-risk operations with known high mortality rates and failing to disclose accurate risks to parents.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public HealthLegal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All three accused medical practitioners were found guilty of serious professional misconduct.
  • The investigation followed a whistleblower's report, leading to a lengthy and costly inquiry.

Conclusions:

  • The case underscores the critical importance of transparency and accurate risk communication in pediatric cardiac surgery.
  • Accountability for surgical outcomes and adherence to professional conduct are paramount for patient safety.