Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Control of operant response force

A B Slifkin1, J Brener

  • 1Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook. abs7@psu.edu@psych1.psy.sunysb.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|November 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual control of isometric force in Parkinson's disease.

Neuropsychologia·2001
Same author

Regularity of force tremor in Parkinson's disease.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Intermittency in the visual control of force in Parkinson's disease.

Experimental brain research·2001
Same author

Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

Journal of neurophysiology·2000
Same author

Variability and noise in continuous force production.

Journal of motor behavior·2000
Same author

Fine motor control in rats is disrupted by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2000
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Rats adjusted operant response force differently based on feedback timing. Immediate feedback used time-to-peak force adjustments, while terminal feedback relied on rate-of-force rise modulation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Operant response force production relies on motor-control strategies.
  • Understanding feedback's role in motor learning is crucial for explaining motor control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in motor-control strategies (feedback vs. feedforward) in rats producing operant response force.
  • To examine how external feedback timing influences these motor-control strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Rats performed operant force responses under two conditions: immediate feedback and terminal feedback.
  • Immediate feedback: Reinforcers delivered upon meeting force requirement.
  • Terminal feedback: Reinforcers delivered at response termination.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • When feedback was precluded (terminal condition), rats modulated the rate of force rise.
  • With immediate feedback, rats adjusted the time to peak force.
  • These findings suggest distinct motor-control strategies are employed based on feedback availability.

Conclusions:

  • Motor-control strategies for operant response force differ based on external feedback timing.
  • Immediate feedback utilizes time-to-peak adjustments, akin to human speed-accuracy trade-offs.
  • Terminal feedback relies on rate-of-force modulation, indicating a shift in motor-control strategy.