Related Experiment Videos
Sex cues in estimating and performing a simple motor task
Perceptual and Motor Skills
|October 1, 1976
Summary
Men estimated and performed higher than women in a level of aspiration experiment. Sex-role stereotypes influenced performance when participants were shown average scores for men versus women.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Sex cues can influence individual performance and aspirations.
- Understanding the impact of social stereotypes on behavior is crucial in psychological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the direct behavioral effects of sex cues on performance.
- To examine how different referent scores (general average, male average, female average) affect aspiration levels.
- To determine the influence of experimenter's sex on participant behavior.
Main Methods:
- Modified level of aspiration experiment involving 120 undergraduate students (60 male, 60 female).
- Participants were assigned a constant referent score (25) presented as a general average, male average, or female average.
- Experimenter's sex was controlled and its effects analyzed.
Main Results:
- Male participants consistently estimated and performed at significantly higher levels than female participants.
- Participants who received the average score for men estimated and performed lower than those who received the average score for women.
- The sex of the experimenter did not have a significant effect on participant performance.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral outcomes are significantly influenced by sex-role stereotypes, particularly when social comparison cues are gender-specific.
- Future research should consider the pervasive impact of sex-role stereotypes in experimental designs and interpretations.
- The findings highlight the importance of social context in shaping individual performance and aspiration levels.