Related Experiment Videos
Is follicular atresia biphasic?
L E Leidy1, L R Godfrey, M R Sutherland
1University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 01003-4805, USA. leidy@anthro.umass.edu
Fertility and Sterility
|November 7, 1998
Summary
Human oocyte depletion does not show an abrupt increase around age 38. The perceived acceleration in follicle loss is an artifact of log-linear plotting, not a biological change.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive biology
- Ovarian physiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Human oocyte depletion is a critical factor in female reproductive aging.
- Previous interpretations suggested a biphasic pattern of follicular atresia around age 38, linked to decreased fecundability and increased chromosomal abnormalities.
- Log-linear plots are commonly used to model biological decay rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the rate of human follicular depletion.
- To investigate the interpretation of curved scatters observed on log-linear plots of follicular depletion data.
- To determine if there is a biological basis for an accelerated rate of follicle loss around age 38.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of published autopsy and histologic data on human ovaries.
- Application and comparison of four distinct mathematical models to the follicular depletion data.
- Examination of data on original measurement scales and log-linear transformed scales.
Main Results:
- Human oocyte depletion data do not support a biphasic follicular atresia model.
- No significant perturbation in follicle loss rates was observed between ages 37 and 40.
- The instantaneous rate of follicle loss is lower after age 40 than previously suggested.
Conclusions:
- There is no evidence of an abrupt increase in follicular atresia rate around age 38.
- The perceived acceleration in follicular depletion is an artifact of log-linear transformation, not a biological phenomenon.
- Reproductive aging and associated risks should be interpreted based on non-transformed data for accuracy.