Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning to predict human error: issues of acceptability, reliability and validity

N A Stanton1, S V Stevenage

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, UK.

Ergonomics
|November 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Forecasting emergent risks in advanced AI systems: an analysis of a future road transport management system.

Ergonomics·2023
Same author

Managing the risks associated with technological disruption in the road transport system: a control structure modelling approach.

Ergonomics·2023
Same author

Who is responsible for global road safety? A cross-cultural comparison of Actor Maps.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2018
Same author

Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2017
Same author

State-of-science: situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems.

Ergonomics·2017
Same author

Divide and rule: A qualitative analysis of the debriefing process in elite team sports.

Applied ergonomics·2015
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Human Error Identification (HEI) techniques are popular but lack evidence. This study shows HEI methods, like SHERPA, are easy to learn and offer reliable human error predictions.

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Risk Management
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Human Error Identification (HEI) techniques have been widely used for two decades to predict human error in high-risk settings.
  • Despite their widespread application, including in product assessment, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence supporting their efficacy.
  • The increasing adoption necessitates rigorous validation of these predictive approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of Human Error Identification techniques.
  • To provide evidence for the practical acquisition and predictive accuracy of HEI methods.
  • To assess the specific performance of the SHERPA (Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Analysis) technique.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing Human Error Identification techniques.
  • Empirical assessment of the ease of acquisition for HEI methods.
  • Validation of predictive accuracy for human error identification.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence suggests that Human Error Identification techniques can be acquired with relative ease.
    • The study indicates that these techniques can provide reasonable predictions of human error.
    • SHERPA, a specific HEI method, demonstrates practical utility and predictive capability.

    Conclusions:

    • Human Error Identification techniques, including SHERPA, show promise for reliable error prediction.
    • The relative ease of acquisition supports broader adoption and training.
    • Further validation is recommended before widespread endorsement, but initial findings are positive.