Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The difficult breast

J T Ziewacz1, D P Neumann, R E Weiner

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|November 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiolabeled peptides in diagnosis and therapy.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2001
Same author

Early detection of oleic acid-induced lung injury in rats using (111)In-labeled anti-rat intercellular adhesion molecule-1.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2001
Same author

Benign schwannoma.

Medicine and health, Rhode Island·2000
Same author

Diagnosis and management of spinal epidural space extravasation complicating percutaneous central venous line placement in a premature infant: case report and review of literature.

Connecticut medicine·2000
Same author

Cysts and cystic lesions of the mandible: clinical and radiologic-histopathologic review.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·1999
Same author

Imaging infection/inflammations. Pathophysiologic basis and radiopharmaceuticals.

The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)·1999
Same journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

TeleSurgery: The Present and the Future for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive/Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Mammography screening for breast cancer can be inconclusive. Developing imaging techniques and less invasive biopsy methods aim to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Mammography is a standard breast cancer screening tool.
  • Screening mammograms can yield inconclusive results, leading to patient anxiety and further testing.
  • A significant number of biopsies performed after screening are for benign conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review emerging diagnostic techniques for breast cancer assessment.
  • To explore advancements in less invasive biopsy methods.
  • To discuss the evolving landscape of breast imaging and biopsy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current and developing breast imaging modalities (ultrasound, nuclear medicine, MR imaging).
  • Evaluation of minimally invasive tissue acquisition techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of these evolving methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Developing techniques show promise in improving the specificity of breast cancer screening.
    • Minimally invasive biopsy methods offer alternatives to open biopsy, potentially reducing costs and patient morbidity.
    • The field is rapidly advancing, with ongoing research into novel imaging and biopsy approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research and clinical validation are needed for emerging breast imaging and biopsy technologies.
    • These advancements hold the potential to decrease the rate of benign biopsies and improve patient outcomes.
    • The future of breast cancer evaluation is dynamic, integrating advanced imaging with refined biopsy techniques.