Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Test-retest reliability in clinical electrocochleography

L M Bergholtz, R E Hooper, D C Mehta

The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology

|September 1, 1976

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Acoustic shock controversies.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2014

Same author

Sample registration in gujarat, india.

Demography·2011

Same author

Massive primary hemorrhage during tonsillectomy from a large venous varicosity.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·1997

Same author

An 18-year follow-up of primary hepatic carcinoid with carcinoid syndrome.

Journal of clinical gastroenterology·1996

Same author

Giant sigmoid diverticulum: report of two cases and endoscopic recognition.

The American journal of gastroenterology·1996

Same author

Last male sperm precedence in a damselfly demonstrated by RAPD profiling.

Molecular ecology·1996

Same journal

Laryngeal Injuries Following General Endotracheal Anesthesia: A Case Series.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

Same journal

Clinical and Voice Outcome Differences in Vocal Cord Cysts with and Without Sulcus Vocalis: Insights From a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

Same journal

Bioabsorbable Stenting in a Case of Severe Pediatric Posterior Glottic Stenosis.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin Otic Suspension, 0.3% for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: Results from two Phase III Randomized Clinical Studies.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

Same journal

Evaluation Of the Expression Levels Of SerpinB3/B4/B10, Interleukin-17 As Biomarkers For Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

Same journal

Correlation of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Rhinogram Features Beyond Simple Airway Resistance.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026

See all related articles

Clinical electrocochleography demonstrates good test-retest reliability for amplitude and excellent reliability for latency. Amplitude variability was consistent across hearing loss types, while latency was more stable at higher intensities.

Area of Science:

Audiology
Neurophysiology
Otoacoustic Emissions

Background:

Clinical electrocochleography (ECoG) is crucial for diagnosing inner ear disorders.
Understanding the test-retest reliability of ECoG measures is essential for accurate clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the intratest test-retest reliability of amplitude and latency measurements in clinical electrocochleography.
To investigate factors influencing the reliability of ECoG measures, including hearing loss type and intensity.

Main Methods:

Eighty-four amplitude and latency comparisons were performed in 40 patients with diverse hearing loss types.
Intratest measurements were analyzed for differences between test and retest conditions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

Good test-retest correlation was observed for amplitude, unaffected by hearing loss type or sequential testing.
Excellent test-retest correlation was found for latency.
Smaller amplitudes near action potential (AP) threshold showed less absolute variability than larger amplitudes.
Latency exhibited less variability at higher intensities compared to near AP threshold.

Conclusions:

Clinical electrocochleography demonstrates robust intratest reliability for both amplitude and latency.
Amplitude reliability is consistent across various hearing loss types.
Latency measurements are more stable at higher stimulus intensities.