Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prosthesis-bone interface

H Plenk1

  • 1Department for Bone and Biomaterials Research, Histological-Embryological Institute, University of Vienna, Austria. Hanns.Plenk@univie.2c.2t

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
|December 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term clinical and histological evaluation of bioceramic total hip endoprostheses.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Quantitative angiographic and histopathologic evaluation of experimental aneurysms.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2010
Same author

Histological demonstration of healing in experimental aneurysms.

Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN·2009
Same author

Computerized assessment of angiographic occlusion rate and coil density in embolized human cerebral aneurysms.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2009
Same author

Cartilage and bone neoformation in rabbit carotid bifurcation aneurysms after endovascular coil embolization.

European cells & materials·2008
Same author

Retrieval analyses of highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners four and five years after implantation.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2007
Same journal

Optimizing the tensile properties of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel for the construction of a bioprosthetic heart valve stent.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Wear of conventional and cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished and roughened CoCr femoral heads in a biaxial hip simulator.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Immobilization of natural macromolecules on poly-L-lactic acid membrane surface in order to improve its cytocompatibility.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Light scattering and in vitro biocompatibility studies of poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) derivatives with amino-acid-dependent groups.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Immobilization of an oxalate-degrading enzyme on silicone elastomer.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
See all related articles

This study reviews microscopic views of prosthesis-bone interfaces after various implantation techniques. It highlights differences between bioinert and bioactive materials for better bone integration.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Understanding the interface between prostheses and bone is crucial for successful clinical outcomes.
  • Various techniques exist for implant fixation, each with distinct biological responses.
  • The properties of implant materials significantly influence bone integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of microscopic appearances at prosthesis-bone interfaces.
  • To compare different implantation techniques and their effects on bone integration.
  • To critically analyze the distinction between bioinert and bioactive prosthetic materials.

Main Methods:

  • Review of selected literature and author's studies.
  • Microscopic examination using light, fluorescence, and backscattered electron microscopy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of microradiographs of undecalcified ground sections.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed description and illustration of histomorphologies for various implantation techniques (impaction, cement fixation, ongrowth, interlocking).
    • Emphasis on mineralization-demineralization kinetics at the bone matrix-implant interface.
    • Critical analysis of bioinert versus bioactive material interactions with bone.

    Conclusions:

    • Different implantation techniques result in characteristic microscopic bone responses.
    • Material properties (bioinert vs. bioactive) critically affect bone bonding and stability.
    • Histomorphological analysis provides insights into the biological performance of orthopedic and dental implants.