Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes. Differential interference effects

U Castiello1

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Experimental Brain Research
|December 22, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impulsive brain: Neural underpinnings of binge eating behavior in normal-weight adults.

Appetite·2019
Same author

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and working memory: a task switching paradigm.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2006
Same author

Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality.

Neurology·2004
Same author

Effects of left parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2002
Same author

Perceiving an entire object and grasping only half of it.

Neuropsychologia·2001
Same author

The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Attentional mechanisms impact reach-to-grasp movements. Distractor object dimensionality (3D vs. 2D) selectively interferes with reaching or grasping components, demonstrating how attention influences motor control.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Attentional mechanisms are crucial for prioritizing relevant information and suppressing distractors.
  • Understanding how attention modulates motor actions, like reach-to-grasp, is key to explaining goal-directed movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of attentional mechanisms on the kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements.
  • To determine how the dimensionality of distracting stimuli affects motor performance during a primary task.

Main Methods:

  • Measuring kinematic changes in reach-to-grasp movements.
  • Introducing secondary tasks with either two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) distractor objects to divert attention.
  • Comparing movement kinematics under different distractor conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Movement kinematics were significantly more affected by 3D distractors than 2D distractors.
  • 3D distractors altered both reaching and grasping components, while 2D distractors primarily modified the reaching component.
  • Attention directed towards distractors interfered with the kinematics of the target action.

Conclusions:

  • The dimensionality and nature of distractors selectively influence specific components of prehension (reaching or grasping).
  • Attentional load associated with distractors leads to interference in motor control.
  • This study highlights the intricate relationship between attention, perception, and the execution of complex motor tasks.