Related Experiment Videos
Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent
1Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Sagunto Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas
|December 29, 1998
Summary
Rectal prolapse patients show a weak anal canal, impacting fecal continence. Incontinent individuals experience more nerve damage and reduced sphincter control compared to continent patients.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and Colorectal Surgery
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Neurophysiology
Background:
- Rectal prolapse is a condition affecting anorectal function.
- Fecal continence is a critical outcome in rectal prolapse management.
- Understanding the physiological differences between continent and incontinent rectal prolapse patients is crucial for targeted treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate anorectal physiological alterations in rectal prolapse patients.
- To compare fecal continence and incontinence groups within rectal prolapse.
- To evaluate differences in neuromuscular function and anal canal pressures.
Main Methods:
- Study included 18 rectal prolapse patients (8 continent, 10 incontinent) and 22 healthy controls.
- Methods included clinical examination, perineal descent measurement, anorectal manometry, and electrophysiology.
- Anorectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli was assessed.
Main Results:
- Both continent and incontinent rectal prolapse groups exhibited a hypotonic anal canal at rest and during voluntary squeeze compared to controls.
- Incontinent patients had significantly lower resting anal canal pressure and longer pudendal motor latency.
- Pudendal neuropathy was more prevalent and severe in incontinent patients.
Conclusions:
- Rectal prolapse is associated with a hypotonic anal canal, irrespective of fecal continence.
- Continent rectal prolapse patients demonstrate less pudendal neuropathy and better voluntary sphincter squeeze function than incontinent patients.