Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the category-specific deficit for living things spurious?

M A Kurbat1, M J Farah

  • 1University of Pennsylvania Department of Psychology Philadelphia PA US 3815 Walnut Street 19104, USA.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|December 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Neurological patients sometimes struggle more naming living things than nonliving things. This study

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain Activity Underlying Mental Imagery: Event-related Potentials During Mental Image Generation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Savings in relearning face-name associations as evidence for "covert recognition" in prosopagnosia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Visual Object Representation: Interpreting Neurophysiological Data within a Computational Framework.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Mechanisms of spatial attention: the relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010
Same author

Prosopamnesia: a selective impairment in face learning.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology
  • Neurolinguistics

Background:

  • Some neurological patients exhibit a selective deficit in naming living things compared to nonliving things.
  • This phenomenon persists even when controlling for naming difficulty in healthy individuals.
  • Previous research suggested this deficit might be an artifact of statistical noise in regression analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of the selective living-things deficit in neurological patients.
  • To test the hypothesis that the deficit is an artifact of statistical noise.
  • To provide evidence for or against specialized mechanisms for recognizing living things.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted Monte Carlo simulations to analyze naming performance data from two neurological patients.
  • Statistically modeled the potential influence of noise on regression analyses to explain the observed deficit.
  • Compared simulation outcomes with actual patient data to evaluate competing explanations.

Main Results:

  • Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that statistical noise could not fully account for the observed living-things deficit in the two patients studied.
  • The findings indicate that the deficit is unlikely to be a spurious artifact of the analytical method.
  • The results support the existence of a genuine, selective impairment in processing living entities.

Conclusions:

  • The selective deficit in naming living things in these patients is not explained by statistical artifacts.
  • The findings lend support to theories positing specialized neural mechanisms for the recognition of living things.
  • This research contributes to understanding the neural basis of semantic memory and object recognition.

Related Experiment Videos