Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone-implant interface, objectivization of X-ray microanalysis

M Lewandowska-Szumieł1, K Sikorski, A Szummer

  • 1Department of Transplantology, Medical School, Warszawa.

Annals of Transplantation
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells in 3D conditions - comparison of spheroids and polystyrene scaffolds.

European cells & materials·2019
Same author

Alternative methods for assessing biocompatibility and function of implant materials.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2014
Same author

Moisture-cured silicone-urethanes-candidate materials for tissue engineering: a biocompatibility study in vitro.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2010
Same author

The effect of sodium-ion implantation on the properties of titanium.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2008
Same author

Effect of the heating temperature on the corrosion resistance of alkali-treated titanium.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2008
Same author

Comparison of self-reported pain and the PAINAD scale in hospitalized cognitively impaired and intact older adults after hip fracture surgery.

Orthopedic nursing·2008

Proper sample preparation is crucial for accurate X-ray microanalysis of bone-implant interfaces. Mechanical polishing introduces artifacts; microtome or diamond saw cutting and ultrasonic cleaning are optimal methods for reliable results.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Materials Characterization
  • Orthopedic Research

Background:

  • Accurate analysis of the bone-implant interface is critical for understanding implant integration and failure.
  • X-ray microanalysis is a key technique for elemental and chemical characterization at this interface.
  • Current sample preparation methods may introduce artifacts, compromising analytical accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different sample preparation techniques for X-ray microanalysis of the bone-implant interface.
  • To identify preparation methods that minimize artifacts and enhance analytical reliability.
  • To provide optimized protocols for researchers investigating bone-implant interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Testing of various techniques for uncovering the bone-implant interface.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of mechanical polishing, microtome cutting (for brittle implants), and diamond saw cutting (for metallic implants).
  • Assessment of the impact of ultrasonic cleaning and conductive layer application.

    • Main Results:

    • Sample preparation methods significantly influence X-ray microanalysis results.
    • Routine mechanical polishing introduces significant artifacts into the bone-implant interface.
    • Microtome cutting for brittle implants and diamond saw cutting for metallic implants were identified as optimal.
    • Ultrasonic cleaning prior to conductive coating is essential.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard mechanical polishing is unsuitable for preparing bone-implant interfaces for X-ray microanalysis.
    • Optimized cutting techniques (microtome or diamond saw) and ultrasonic cleaning are vital for artifact-free analysis.
    • Adopting these refined methods will improve the accuracy and reliability of bone-implant interface investigations.