Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interactive live-wire boundary extraction

W A Barrett1, E N Mortensen

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. barrett@cs.byu.edu

Medical Image Analysis
|January 5, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Oral acanthosis nigricans, the sign of Leser-Trélat and cholangiocarcinoma.

The British journal of dermatology·2001
Same author

Analysis and correction of imperfections in the image intensifier-TV-digitizer imaging chain.

Medical physics·1991
Same author

A PC-based 3D imaging system: algorithms, software, and hardware considerations.

Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society·1990
Same author

Topographic study of sudanophilic lesions in cholesterol-fed minipigs by image analysis.

Arteriosclerosis (Dallas, Tex.)·1985
Same author

Determination of left ventricular contours: a probabilistic algorithm derived from angiographic images.

Computers and biomedical research, an international journal·1980
Same journal

ContiMorph: An unsupervised learning framework for cardiac motion tracking with time-continuous diffeomorphism.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

MedP-CLIP: Medical CLIP with region-aware prompt integration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Multi-organ guided diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment via hierarchical alignment and knowledge distillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

SUDA: Simultaneous unsupervised knowledge distillation and adaptation of foundation models for efficient pathological image analysis.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Annotation-efficient medical image segmentation via cross-latent graphs and vector-quantized memory.

Medical image analysis·2026
See all related articles

The live-wire segmentation tool significantly improves boundary extraction efficiency and accuracy. This interactive method requires minimal user input, offering substantial gains in speed and reproducibility for image analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Medical image analysis
  • Computational imaging
  • Image segmentation

Background:

  • Accurate and reproducible boundary extraction is crucial for quantitative image analysis.
  • Manual tracing is time-consuming, subjective, and prone to inter-observer variability.
  • Existing automated segmentation methods often require extensive parameter tuning or user intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the live-wire segmentation technique for interactive boundary extraction.
  • To assess the efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility of live-wire compared to manual tracing.
  • To present novel enhancements: boundary cooling and on-the-fly training.

Main Methods:

  • Live-wire segmentation utilizes an interactive approach where optimal boundaries are computed dynamically as the user moves the mouse from a seed point.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The 'live-wire' boundary snaps to object edges, requiring minimal user guidance.
  • Boundary cooling automates seed point generation, and on-the-fly training adapts the algorithm to specific image features.

    • Main Results:

    • Live-wire segmentation achieved boundary extraction in one-fifth the time of manual tracing.
    • Accuracy was 4.4 times greater, and reproducibility was 4.8 times greater than manual methods.
    • Interobserver reproducibility with live-wire was 3.8 times higher than intraobserver reproducibility with manual tracing.

    Conclusions:

    • The live-wire segmentation tool offers a highly efficient, accurate, and reproducible method for boundary extraction.
    • It significantly reduces user input and variability in image segmentation tasks.
    • The enhancements of boundary cooling and on-the-fly training further optimize its performance and applicability.