Impact of an aggressive coronary stenting strategy on the incidence of target lesion revascularization

Coronary stenting has been shown to reduce the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with balloon angioplasty in highly selected patients. However, the impact of an aggressive coronary stenting strategy in unselected patients on the overall incidence of TLR is unclear. We assessed the effect of increased stenting by comparing long-term results in consecutive patients who underwent successful percutaneous revascularization (with or without stents) during June to December 1995 (n=347) with those in June to December 1996 (n=401). Stents were used in 22.5% of patients in 1995 versus 66.1% in 1996 (p <0.0001). Mean age of the patients was 62+/-11 years (71% men) in 1995 versus 63+/-10 in 1996 (76% men) (p=NS). The 2 groups were well matched with the exception that the 1996 cohort included more patients with unstable coronary syndromes (25% in 1995 vs 34% in 1996 (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of in-hospital adverse events. After 12 months of follow-up (complete in 95% of patients in each group), the incidence of TLR was significantly lower in the 1996 cohort than in the 1995 cohort (8.5% vs 14.7%, p=0.0075). This was mainly due to reduced requirement for repeat angioplasty in 1996 patients compared with 1995 (6.5% vs 11.8%, p=0.011). It is concluded that in an unselected patient population, an aggressive coronary stenting strategy was associated with a marked overall reduction in requirement for TLR over a 12-month period.