Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Use of 222Rn-resistant techniques in new home construction

J E Watson1, R A Cote

  • 1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, 27599-7400, USA.

Health Physics
|January 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality health care requires quality patient data.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Sorption/Desorption of lincomycin from three arid-region soils.

Journal of environmental quality·2013
Same author

Predicting the occurrence of radon-222 in groundwater supplies.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2013
Same author

Comparison of equilibrium and non-equilibrium distribution coefficients for the human drug carbamazepine in soil.

Chemosphere·2013
Same author

Observation of the decay B- → D(s)((*)+) K- ℓ- ν(ℓ).

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Search for production of invisible final states in single-photon decays of Υ(1S).

Physical review letters·2011
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Many North Carolina builders use radon-resistant construction techniques in new homes, but few use them extensively. This study assessed radon mitigation methods in Zone 1 counties, identifying a low adoption rate for widespread radon reduction strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Building Science
  • Public Health

Background:

  • High indoor radon (222Rn) levels pose a significant health risk, particularly in areas with high screening potential.
  • Zone 1 counties in North Carolina are identified as having elevated average predicted indoor 222Rn screening potential (>148 Bq m(-3)).
  • The adoption of radon-resistant construction techniques is crucial for mitigating indoor radon exposure in new homes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current use of radon-resistant construction techniques in new home building within North Carolina's Zone 1 counties.
  • To understand the extent to which builders are implementing strategies to reduce radon entry into residences.
  • To compare local adoption rates with national data.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A survey postcard was mailed to 460 home builders in North Carolina's Zone 1 counties.
  • The survey collected data on the reported use of radon-resistant construction techniques in 1996.
  • Response rates were analyzed and compared to national survey data.

    • Main Results:

    • The survey achieved a 17% response rate, significantly higher than the national average of 4.9%.
    • 62% of responding builders reported using some radon-resistant techniques, but only 10% used them extensively.
    • National data indicated 30% of homes in Zone 1 counties had radon venting features.

    Conclusions:

    • While a majority of surveyed builders reported some use of radon-resistant techniques, widespread implementation remains limited.
    • Low survey response rates suggest potential bias in the findings for both this study and national comparisons.
    • Further research and outreach are needed to increase the consistent application of radon mitigation strategies in new home construction.