Related Experiment Videos
Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis
M R Langlois1, J R Delanghe, S R Steyaert
1Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Gent, Belgium.
Clinical Chemistry
|January 23, 1999
Summary
The Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis system shows good agreement with dipstick methods for erythrocytes and leukocytes. This flow cytometer offers a clinically acceptable way to reduce manual microscopic analysis workload.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Medical Technology
- Laboratory Diagnostics
Background:
- Automated urinalysis aims to improve efficiency and accuracy in clinical laboratories.
- The Sysmex UF-100 is a novel flow cytometer designed for automated urine particle analysis.
- Comparison with established methods is crucial for validating new diagnostic technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer in automated urinalysis.
- To compare UF-100 results with an automated dipstick reader and microscopic sediment analysis.
- To assess the clinical utility of the UF-100 for routine urinalysis.
Main Methods:
- A cross-check analysis was performed on 1001 urine samples.
- Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer results were compared against an automated dipstick reader.
- Microscopic sediment data served as a reference for certain parameters.
Main Results:
- Good agreement was observed between UF-100 and dipstick data for erythrocytes (r=0.636) and leukocytes (r=0.785).
- The UF-100 accurately detected lysed erythrocytes and showed a higher bacterial count in nitrite-positive samples.
- Increased bacterial counts and decreased leukocyte scatter were noted in stored urine; microscopic review is needed for casts and yeast.
Conclusions:
- The Sysmex UF-100 demonstrates reliable performance for key urinalysis parameters, correlating well with automated dipstick methods.
- Computer-assisted cross-checking of UF-100 and dipstick data can create an efficient system for reducing manual microscopic urinalysis.
- While effective for screening, confirmation by microscopy is recommended for specific findings like casts and yeast cells.