Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Response decision processes in relational and overt aggression

N R Crick1, N E Werner

  • 1Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. crick001@gold.tc.umn.edu

Child Development
|January 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Childhood aggression and gender: a new look at an old problem.

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation·2000
Same author

Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1999
Same author

Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool.

Developmental psychology·1999
Same author

Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: a multiinformant approach.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1998
Same author

Relational and overt aggression in preschool.

Developmental psychology·1997
Same author

Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: links to social-psychological adjustment.

Developmental psychology·1997
Same journal

Reciprocal relations between parent-adolescent closeness and adolescent depressive symptoms across the pre-to-post COVID-19 pandemic.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Young children use conversational timing as a cue for prosocial commitment.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Timing and type of domestic violence exposure and adolescents' experiences of peer violence.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Children

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Aggression in children is a significant area of study.
  • Understanding children's decision-making processes in response to conflict is crucial.
  • Previous research has explored different forms of aggression, including relational and overt.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the response decision processes of relationally and overtly aggressive children.
  • To investigate how gender influences evaluations of different aggression types in various conflict situations.
  • To analyze children's perceptions of relational and overt aggression in both relational and instrumental conflicts.

Main Methods:

  • A hypothetical-situation instrument was administered to 1,166 third- through sixth-grade children.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants evaluated relational and overt aggressive responses to relational and instrumental conflict scenarios.
  • Data were analyzed to identify patterns in aggression evaluation based on child's aggression type, gender, situation type, and response type.

    • Main Results:

    • Both overtly aggressive boys and girls positively evaluated overt aggression in instrumental conflicts.
    • Overtly aggressive girls, unlike boys, positively evaluated overt aggression in relational conflicts.
    • Relationally aggressive boys positively evaluated relational aggression in instrumental conflicts.
    • Gender differences emerged: boys favored overt aggression, while girls favored relational aggression.

    Conclusions:

    • Children's evaluations of aggression are influenced by their own aggressive tendencies, gender, and the nature of the conflict.
    • Findings highlight distinct social information processing patterns for different aggression types and genders.
    • Understanding these nuances is vital for developing targeted interventions for aggressive behavior in children.