[Occurrence of changes in the eye in diabetic retinopathy with significant myopia]

The optic disc and retinal neovascularization are less prominent and less frequent in myopic eyes in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. The exact mechanisms of this phenomenon are not well known, but there is some evidence that there is a reduced blood flow in myopic eyes which is associated with less damaged microcirculation in eyes of patients with diabetes mellitus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between myopic refractive error and degree of diabetic retinopathy. We conducted a retrospective study in a group of randomized patients, divided into the following groups according to their refractive error: emmetropia (30 eyes), myopia simplex (30 eyes) and high myopia, over -6.5 dsph (21 eyes). Among patients with high myopia, seven had monocular myopia. All patients suffered from non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus for more than ten years, and their average age was 52.37-3.48 years. We did not observe patients with rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma or patients with myopia less than -2.0 dsph. Our results indicated that there was no significant difference in the appearance of fundus between the studied groups. In all patients the incidence rate of non proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy was the same as well as the absence of retinopathy (Fisher's test). The only exception were the patients with monocular myopia over -13.o dsph who had no signs of diabetic retinopathy in myopic eye, while the other, emmetropic eye, showed various stages of retinopathy, from severe non proliferative to proliferative. Some of the risk factors which influence the incidence rate of ocular complications in diabetic patients are well known, as are duration of diabetes mellitus, blood sugar level, blood pressure, ocular pressure and eye perfusion. On the other hand, it is also known that amblyopia, optic atrophy, low blood pressure in central retinal artery and retinitis pigmentosa are ocular conditions which are not associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. It was also noticed that complications of diabetes in high myopic eyes are less prominent than in emmetropic eyes. This finding is in harmony with our results. Sultanov et al. observed diabetic changes in the retina in 40.9% of myopic refraction patients, 65.2% of emmetropia cases and 70.4% of hypermetropia cases. The severity of involvement was less in myopia than in other types of refraction. In medium severe myopia, no proliferative diabetic retinopathy was observed, and in high myopia (10 eyes) no diabetic involvement of the fundus oculi was found. In anisometropia diabetic symptoms on the myopic side were either absent or poorly manifest. The possible cause of such findings could be the changes in retinal perfusion in myopic eyes and eyes in patients with diabetes mellitus. In 1973 a lower blood flow was detected in the retina and the choroid, proportionally to the degree of myopia. In 1982, Perkins indicated that the circulation time and pulsation rate in the central retinal artery in myopic eyes were reduced proportionally to the degree of myopia. In cases with early diabetic retinopathy Coscas detected a lesser blood flow in retinal veins. On the other hand, it has been found that high blood pressure increases the risk of diabetic retinopathy. These data suggest that the reduced blood flow in high myopia is a protective factor regarding the occurrence of complications in diabetes. Anisometropia and amblyopia in cases with monocular myopia, which presents a particular group in our study, could be factors which also prevent the occurrence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Instead of conclusion, we would like to point out that pathophysiologic mechanisms of these phenomena are not discussed enough. It is, nevertheless, important to appropriately examine the fundus in patients with high myopia and diabetes mellitus, because if the complications appear, they may be disastrous and must be treated immediately.