Is all unstable angina the same? insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I). The CAVEAT-Investigators
R A Harrington1, R M Califf, D R Holmes
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Insights
Unstable angina patients face higher percutaneous revascularization complication risks, with specific subgroups like those with electrocardiographic changes experiencing worse outcomes. Clinical presentation is key to identifying high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Unstable angina is linked to poorer results following percutaneous revascularization.
- Identifying specific unstable angina presentations associated with adverse outcomes is crucial for risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare percutaneous revascularization outcomes in patients with and without unstable angina.
- To analyze outcomes across different unstable angina subgroups within the CAVEAT-I trial.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with (n=690) and without (n=320) unstable angina in the CAVEAT-I trial.
- Subgroup analysis based on anginal presentation: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic ECG changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain.
- Construction of regression models to predict in-hospital and 6-month composite endpoints (death, infarction, bypass surgery, revascularization, abrupt closure/restenosis).
Main Results:
- Chest pain with electrocardiographic changes significantly predicted worse in-hospital composite outcomes (24% vs 17%, P=.0374) and showed greater acute gain, late loss, and restenosis.
- Rest chest pain was associated with a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29%, P=.0472).
- Atherectomy demonstrated worse overall outcomes compared to angioplasty across all unstable angina categories.
Conclusions:
- Patients with unstable angina generally experience more percutaneous revascularization complications than those without.
- The specific clinical presentation of unstable angina influences complication rates, with certain subgroups facing particularly high risks.
- Clinical presentation can aid in identifying unstable angina patients at elevated risk for adverse events after revascularization.
Background:
Certain characteristics of unstable angina have been associated with worse clinical outcomes after percutaneous revascularization procedures.
Methods And Results:
We compared outcomes of patients with (n = 690) and those without (n = 320) unstable angina in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I) by unstable angina subgroup: rest chest pain, postinfarction chest pain, chest pain with ischemic electrocardiographic changes, chest pain with recent acceleration, and no chest pain. Regression models were constructed to predict in-hospital and 6-month composite end point death, infarction, bypass surgery, percutaneous revascularization, and abrupt closure (in-hospital) or restenosis (6 months) for each subgroup. Only chest pain with electrocardiographic changes predicted the composite in-hospital outcome (24% vs 17% with no chest pain, P =.0374.) This subgroup also had a greater acute gain, more late loss, and more restenosis than patients in the other subgroups. Rest chest pain carried a higher incidence of the composite 6-month outcome (39.9% vs 29% with no chest pain, P =.0472). For all unstable angina categories, atherectomy was associated with worse overall outcomes than angioplasty.
Conclusions:
Patients with unstable angina have more complications of percutaneous revascularization than patients without unstable angina, but event rates vary by anginal subgroup. The clinical presentation may help to identify unstable angina patients at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina II: Classification
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management


