Showing results (1-10 of 102) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 11
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|March 30, 2006
Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...orAdrian Staub, Charles CliftonJournal of Memory and Language|October 19, 2006
Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movementsAdrian Staub, Charles Clifton, Lyn FrazierCognitive Science|November 5, 2016
The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative SentencesAdrian Staub, Brian Dillon, Charles CliftonJournal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|September 8, 2011
Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and ChristiansenAdrian Staub, Margaret Grant, Charles Clifton, et al.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|April 22, 2009
Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal readingAdrian Staub, Margaret Grant, Charles Clifton, et al.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|May 25, 2011
Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architectureAdrian StaubJournal of Memory and Language|July 14, 2009
The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysisAdrian StaubCognition|April 30, 2010
Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clausesAdrian StaubJournal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance|July 31, 2020
Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?Adrian StaubJournal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|May 2, 2007
The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after allAdrian StaubPageof 11