Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Angelika M Stefan

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Royal Society Open Science|February 13, 2023
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of <i>p</i>-hacking strategiesAngelika M Stefan, Felix D Schönbrodt
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|November 7, 2019
Bayesian power equivalence in latent growth curve modelsAngelika M Stefan, Timo von Oertzen
Behavior Research Methods|September 25, 2023
Bayesian hierarchical modeling: an introduction and reassessmentMyrthe Veenman, Angelika M Stefan, Julia M Haaf
Psychological Methods|February 8, 2024
Interim design analysis using Bayes factor forecastsAngelika M Stefan, Quentin F Gronau, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Psychological Methods|September 17, 2020
Practical challenges and methodological flexibility in prior elicitationAngelika M Stefan, Nathan J Evans, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|April 5, 2022
Expert agreement in prior elicitation and its effects on Bayesian inferenceAngelika M Stefan, Dimitris Katsimpokis, Quentin F Gronau, et al.
Behavior Research Methods|March 2, 2022
Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor testAngelika M Stefan, Felix D Schönbrodt, Nathan J Evans, et al.
Behavior Research Methods|February 6, 2019
A tutorial on Bayes Factor Design Analysis using an informed priorAngelika M Stefan, Quentin F Gronau, Felix D Schönbrodt, et al.
Computational Brain & Behavior|March 7, 2023
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on ResponsesJohnny van Doorn, Frederik Aust, Julia M Haaf, et al.
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|March 20, 2025
Interpersonal versus intrapersonal emotion regulation: Intensity of negative emotion predicts usage probabilityNathalie Claus, Aleya Flechsenhar, Franziska Motka, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Royal Society Open Science|February 13, 2023
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of <i>p</i>-hacking strategiesAngelika M Stefan, Felix D Schönbrodt
The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology|November 7, 2019
Bayesian power equivalence in latent growth curve modelsAngelika M Stefan, Timo von Oertzen
Behavior Research Methods|September 25, 2023
Bayesian hierarchical modeling: an introduction and reassessmentMyrthe Veenman, Angelika M Stefan, Julia M Haaf
Psychological Methods|February 8, 2024
Interim design analysis using Bayes factor forecastsAngelika M Stefan, Quentin F Gronau, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Psychological Methods|September 17, 2020
Practical challenges and methodological flexibility in prior elicitationAngelika M Stefan, Nathan J Evans, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|April 5, 2022
Expert agreement in prior elicitation and its effects on Bayesian inferenceAngelika M Stefan, Dimitris Katsimpokis, Quentin F Gronau, et al.
Behavior Research Methods|March 2, 2022
Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor testAngelika M Stefan, Felix D Schönbrodt, Nathan J Evans, et al.
Behavior Research Methods|February 6, 2019
A tutorial on Bayes Factor Design Analysis using an informed priorAngelika M Stefan, Quentin F Gronau, Felix D Schönbrodt, et al.
Computational Brain & Behavior|March 7, 2023
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on ResponsesJohnny van Doorn, Frederik Aust, Julia M Haaf, et al.
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|March 20, 2025
Interpersonal versus intrapersonal emotion regulation: Intensity of negative emotion predicts usage probabilityNathalie Claus, Aleya Flechsenhar, Franziska Motka, et al.
Pageof 1