Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Atle Fretheim

Showing results (141-150 of 170) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 29, 2017
Heterogeneity in application, design, and analysis characteristics was found for controlled before-after and interrupted time series studies included in Cochrane reviewsStephanie Polus, Dawid Pieper, Jacob Burns, et al.
Health Research Policy and Systems|March 6, 2022
Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?Andrew D Oxman, Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 7, 2012
Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysisAtle Fretheim, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Odd Brørs, et al.
BMJ Open|April 24, 2026
Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople's critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic reviewMatt Oxman, Leila Cusack, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, et al.
Trials|January 23, 2017
Can an educational podcast improve the ability of parents of primary school children to assess the reliability of claims made about the benefits and harms of treatments: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialDaniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Matt Oxman, et al.
Trials|May 20, 2017
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trialAllen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Andrew D Oxman, et al.
Public Health in Practice (Oxford, England)|September 1, 2021
Relationship between teaching modality and COVID-19, well-being, and teaching satisfaction (campus & corona): A cohort study among students in higher educationAtle Fretheim, Arnfinn Helleve, Borghild Løyland, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 2, 2017
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 12: strengthening global capacity for evidence synthesis of quasi-experimental health systems researchPeter C Rockers, Peter Tugwell, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.
BMJ Open|December 20, 2019
Informed Health Choices media intervention for improving people's ability to critically appraise the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised trial in UgandaDaniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Andrew Oxman, et al.
BMJ Open|October 22, 2025
Participants' experiences of potential adverse effects of an intervention to improve critical thinking about health choices: a qualitative cross-trial process evaluation in Kenya, Rwanda and UgandaMatt Oxman, Faith Chesire, Michael Mugisha, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (141-150 of 170) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 29, 2017
Heterogeneity in application, design, and analysis characteristics was found for controlled before-after and interrupted time series studies included in Cochrane reviewsStephanie Polus, Dawid Pieper, Jacob Burns, et al.
Health Research Policy and Systems|March 6, 2022
Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?Andrew D Oxman, Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 7, 2012
Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysisAtle Fretheim, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Odd Brørs, et al.
BMJ Open|April 24, 2026
Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople's critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic reviewMatt Oxman, Leila Cusack, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, et al.
Trials|January 23, 2017
Can an educational podcast improve the ability of parents of primary school children to assess the reliability of claims made about the benefits and harms of treatments: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialDaniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Matt Oxman, et al.
Trials|May 20, 2017
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trialAllen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Andrew D Oxman, et al.
Public Health in Practice (Oxford, England)|September 1, 2021
Relationship between teaching modality and COVID-19, well-being, and teaching satisfaction (campus & corona): A cohort study among students in higher educationAtle Fretheim, Arnfinn Helleve, Borghild Løyland, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 2, 2017
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 12: strengthening global capacity for evidence synthesis of quasi-experimental health systems researchPeter C Rockers, Peter Tugwell, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.
BMJ Open|December 20, 2019
Informed Health Choices media intervention for improving people's ability to critically appraise the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised trial in UgandaDaniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Andrew Oxman, et al.
BMJ Open|October 22, 2025
Participants' experiences of potential adverse effects of an intervention to improve critical thinking about health choices: a qualitative cross-trial process evaluation in Kenya, Rwanda and UgandaMatt Oxman, Faith Chesire, Michael Mugisha, et al.
Pageof 17