Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (21-30 of 125) with videos related to
Page
of 13
Sort By:
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
August 17, 2016
Are Rules 20d and 20e of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes superfluous?
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
July 5, 2008
Challenging Opinion 83
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
|
September 18, 1999
Proposal to change the Rule governing the designation of type strains deposited under culture collection numbers allocated for patent purposes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
April 26, 2001
Rhodocista centenaria vs Rhodospirillum centenum: a reply to Gest and Favinger
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
December 14, 2018
Names above the rank of genus; the radical approach
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
December 22, 2018
An analysis of the term 'standing in nomenclature', as used in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate and requires a replacement epithet. Opinion 89. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names, the genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 refers to the same taxon as Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 is rejected: Supplementary information to Opinion 75. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
Page
of 13
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (21-30 of 125) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 13
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
August 17, 2016
Are Rules 20d and 20e of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes superfluous?
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
July 5, 2008
Challenging Opinion 83
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
|
September 18, 1999
Proposal to change the Rule governing the designation of type strains deposited under culture collection numbers allocated for patent purposes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
April 26, 2001
Rhodocista centenaria vs Rhodospirillum centenum: a reply to Gest and Favinger
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
December 14, 2018
Names above the rank of genus; the radical approach
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
December 22, 2018
An analysis of the term 'standing in nomenclature', as used in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The epithet aurantiaca in Micromonospora aurantiaca Sveshnikova et al. 1969 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate and requires a replacement epithet. Opinion 89. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
|
October 8, 2014
The genus name Methanothrix Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 do not contravene Rule 31a and are not to be considered as rejected names, the genus name Methanosaeta Patel and Sprott 1990 refers to the same taxon as Methanothrix soehngenii Huser et al. 1983 and the species combination Methanothrix thermophila Kamagata et al. 1992 is rejected: Supplementary information to Opinion 75. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes
B J Tindall
Page
of 13