Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

B Nussbaumer

Showing results (11-20 of 16) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 16 results.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 2, 2021
Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic reviewA I Dobrescu, B Nussbaumer-Streit, I Klerings, et al.
Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift|April 23, 1988
[Ambulatory therapy with amphotericin B]C Berger, A Gratwohl, A Tichelli, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 8, 2019
Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological studyB Nussbaumer-Streit, I Klerings, A I Dobrescu, et al.
Scientific Reports|June 7, 2022
A web-survey assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice among psychotherapists in AustriaB Nussbaumer-Streit, A Jesser, E Humer, et al.
Scientific Reports|August 11, 2022
Author Correction: A web-survey assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice among psychotherapists in AustriaB Nussbaumer-Streit, A Jesser, E Humer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 6, 2021
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping reviewB Nussbaumer-Streit, M Ellen, I Klerings, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (11-20 of 16) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 16 results.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 2, 2021
Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic reviewA I Dobrescu, B Nussbaumer-Streit, I Klerings, et al.
Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift|April 23, 1988
[Ambulatory therapy with amphotericin B]C Berger, A Gratwohl, A Tichelli, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 8, 2019
Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological studyB Nussbaumer-Streit, I Klerings, A I Dobrescu, et al.
Scientific Reports|June 7, 2022
A web-survey assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice among psychotherapists in AustriaB Nussbaumer-Streit, A Jesser, E Humer, et al.
Scientific Reports|August 11, 2022
Author Correction: A web-survey assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice among psychotherapists in AustriaB Nussbaumer-Streit, A Jesser, E Humer, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 6, 2021
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping reviewB Nussbaumer-Streit, M Ellen, I Klerings, et al.
Pageof 2