Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Berit Andersen

Showing results (41-50 of 161) with videos related to

Pageof 17
Sort By:
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|August 3, 2006
Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practiceIda Kangas, Berit Andersen, Frede Olesen, et al.
Ugeskrift for Laeger|November 4, 2008
[24-hour nonstop research training course]Anne-Lene Bleken, Berit Andersen, Berit Eika, et al.
JMIR Formative Research|January 27, 2019
Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative StudyPernille Gabel, Pia Kirkegaard, Mette Bach Larsen, et al.
Trials|October 12, 2018
The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialPernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pia Kirkegaard, et al.
Preventive Medicine Reports|December 21, 2018
Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trialBettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen, Flemming Bro, et al.
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|July 19, 2017
Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practiceBettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen, Flemming Bro, et al.
Ugeskrift for Laeger|October 9, 2014
[Screening mammography may be a rapid and effective investigation of mamma cancer in asymptomatic women]Mette Bach Larsen, Vivian Langagergaard, Heidi Larsson, et al.
BMC Public Health|July 22, 2015
Impact of opportunistic testing in a systematic cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide registry studyMette Tranberg, Mette Bach Larsen, Ellen M Mikkelsen, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America|March 26, 2003
Value of self-reportable screening criteria to identify asymptomatic individuals in the general population for urogential Chlamydia trachomatis infection screeningBerit Andersen, Irene van Valkengoed, Frede Olesen, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|July 1, 2021
Variations in pathways and resource use in follow-up after abnormal mammography screening: a nationwide register-based studySusanne Fogh Jørgensen, Berit Andersen, Anders Lernevall, et al.
Pageof 17

Showing results (41-50 of 161) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 17
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|August 3, 2006
Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practiceIda Kangas, Berit Andersen, Frede Olesen, et al.
Ugeskrift for Laeger|November 4, 2008
[24-hour nonstop research training course]Anne-Lene Bleken, Berit Andersen, Berit Eika, et al.
JMIR Formative Research|January 27, 2019
Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative StudyPernille Gabel, Pia Kirkegaard, Mette Bach Larsen, et al.
Trials|October 12, 2018
The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialPernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pia Kirkegaard, et al.
Preventive Medicine Reports|December 21, 2018
Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trialBettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen, Flemming Bro, et al.
The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners|July 19, 2017
Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practiceBettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen, Flemming Bro, et al.
Ugeskrift for Laeger|October 9, 2014
[Screening mammography may be a rapid and effective investigation of mamma cancer in asymptomatic women]Mette Bach Larsen, Vivian Langagergaard, Heidi Larsson, et al.
BMC Public Health|July 22, 2015
Impact of opportunistic testing in a systematic cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide registry studyMette Tranberg, Mette Bach Larsen, Ellen M Mikkelsen, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America|March 26, 2003
Value of self-reportable screening criteria to identify asymptomatic individuals in the general population for urogential Chlamydia trachomatis infection screeningBerit Andersen, Irene van Valkengoed, Frede Olesen, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|July 1, 2021
Variations in pathways and resource use in follow-up after abnormal mammography screening: a nationwide register-based studySusanne Fogh Jørgensen, Berit Andersen, Anders Lernevall, et al.
Pageof 17