Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Forensic Science International|November 4, 2020
Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Madeline Ausdemore, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|April 27, 2011
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisionsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Joann Buscaglia, et al.
Forensic Science International|April 6, 2016
Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Forensic Science International|March 22, 2017
Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|March 20, 2012
Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examinersBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, et al.
Data in Brief|June 14, 2016
Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprintsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|November 6, 2014
Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Forensic Science International|January 2, 2015
Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparisonBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|May 24, 2021
Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking dataThomas A Busey, Nicholas Heise, R Austin Hicklin, et al.
Forensic Science International|February 12, 2013
Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, George I Kiebuzinski, et al.
Pageof 2