Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Charles A Dorison

Showing results (1-10 of 16) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
The Journal of Applied Psychology|December 12, 2024
Precommitment can allow decision makers to maintain trust when de-escalating commitmentAriella S Kristal, Charles A Dorison
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|February 10, 2022
Observers penalize decision makers whose risk preferences are unaffected by loss-gain framingCharles A Dorison, Blake H Heller
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|August 29, 2024
Group-based reputational incentives can blunt sensitivity to societal harms and benefitsCharles A Dorison, Nour S Kteily
Current Opinion in Psychology|August 20, 2021
Toward a psychology of attitude conflictJulia A Minson, Charles A Dorison
Current Opinion in Psychology|September 9, 2022
Why is exposure to opposing views aversive? Reconciling three theoretical perspectivesJulia A Minson, Charles A Dorison
Psychological Science|August 14, 2025
What Is Rationality, Whom Is It Ascribed To, and Why Does It Matter? Evidence From Internet Text for 66 Social Groups and 101 OccupationsCharles A Dorison, Tessa E S Charlesworth
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|September 28, 2023
The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan informationMolly Moore, Charles A Dorison, Julia A Minson
Cognition|March 6, 2019
Selective exposure partly relies on faulty affective forecastsCharles A Dorison, Julia A Minson, Todd Rogers
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|September 2, 2021
Staying the course: Decision makers who escalate commitment are trusted and trustworthyCharles A Dorison, Christopher K Umphres, Jennifer S Lerner
Psychological Science|September 7, 2022
Underestimating Counterparts' Learning Goals Impairs Conflictual ConversationsHanne K Collins, Charles A Dorison, Francesca Gino, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 16) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
The Journal of Applied Psychology|December 12, 2024
Precommitment can allow decision makers to maintain trust when de-escalating commitmentAriella S Kristal, Charles A Dorison
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|February 10, 2022
Observers penalize decision makers whose risk preferences are unaffected by loss-gain framingCharles A Dorison, Blake H Heller
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|August 29, 2024
Group-based reputational incentives can blunt sensitivity to societal harms and benefitsCharles A Dorison, Nour S Kteily
Current Opinion in Psychology|August 20, 2021
Toward a psychology of attitude conflictJulia A Minson, Charles A Dorison
Current Opinion in Psychology|September 9, 2022
Why is exposure to opposing views aversive? Reconciling three theoretical perspectivesJulia A Minson, Charles A Dorison
Psychological Science|August 14, 2025
What Is Rationality, Whom Is It Ascribed To, and Why Does It Matter? Evidence From Internet Text for 66 Social Groups and 101 OccupationsCharles A Dorison, Tessa E S Charlesworth
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|September 28, 2023
The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan informationMolly Moore, Charles A Dorison, Julia A Minson
Cognition|March 6, 2019
Selective exposure partly relies on faulty affective forecastsCharles A Dorison, Julia A Minson, Todd Rogers
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|September 2, 2021
Staying the course: Decision makers who escalate commitment are trusted and trustworthyCharles A Dorison, Christopher K Umphres, Jennifer S Lerner
Psychological Science|September 7, 2022
Underestimating Counterparts' Learning Goals Impairs Conflictual ConversationsHanne K Collins, Charles A Dorison, Francesca Gino, et al.
Pageof 2