Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Daniel C Murrie

Showing results (21-30 of 49) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Psychological Science|August 24, 2013
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?Daniel C Murrie, Marcus T Boccaccini, Lucy A Guarnera, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|December 18, 2013
Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factor and facet scoresMarcus T Boccaccini, Daniel C Murrie, Katrina A Rufino, et al.
Sexual Abuse : a Journal of Research and Treatment|November 1, 2015
Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Use and Reporting Practices in Sexually Violent Predator EvaluationsMarcus T Boccaccini, Caroline S Chevalier, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|February 23, 2012
When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL-R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic expertsKatrina A Rufino, Marcus T Boccaccini, Samuel W Hawes, et al.
Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : an Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law|April 12, 2021
Rater experience and the predictive validity of Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version scoresHyemin Jeon, Marcus T Boccaccini, Eunkyung Jo, et al.
Psychological Assessment|May 20, 2021
Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysisL Maaike Helmus, R Karl Hanson, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|March 6, 2025
Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?Lucy A Guarnera, Daniel C Murrie, Brett O Gardner, et al.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|April 14, 2023
Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national "competency crisis"Daniel C Murrie, W Neil Gowensmith, Lauren E Kois, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|June 7, 2012
Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders?Marcus T Boccaccini, Darrel B Turner, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|June 3, 2014
How likely is "likely to reoffend" in sex offender civil commitment trials?Jefferson C Knighton, Daniel C Murrie, Marcus T Boccaccini, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (21-30 of 49) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Psychological Science|August 24, 2013
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?Daniel C Murrie, Marcus T Boccaccini, Lucy A Guarnera, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|December 18, 2013
Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factor and facet scoresMarcus T Boccaccini, Daniel C Murrie, Katrina A Rufino, et al.
Sexual Abuse : a Journal of Research and Treatment|November 1, 2015
Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Use and Reporting Practices in Sexually Violent Predator EvaluationsMarcus T Boccaccini, Caroline S Chevalier, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|February 23, 2012
When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL-R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic expertsKatrina A Rufino, Marcus T Boccaccini, Samuel W Hawes, et al.
Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : an Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law|April 12, 2021
Rater experience and the predictive validity of Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version scoresHyemin Jeon, Marcus T Boccaccini, Eunkyung Jo, et al.
Psychological Assessment|May 20, 2021
Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysisL Maaike Helmus, R Karl Hanson, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|March 6, 2025
Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?Lucy A Guarnera, Daniel C Murrie, Brett O Gardner, et al.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|April 14, 2023
Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national "competency crisis"Daniel C Murrie, W Neil Gowensmith, Lauren E Kois, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|June 7, 2012
Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders?Marcus T Boccaccini, Darrel B Turner, Daniel C Murrie, et al.
Law and Human Behavior|June 3, 2014
How likely is "likely to reoffend" in sex offender civil commitment trials?Jefferson C Knighton, Daniel C Murrie, Marcus T Boccaccini, et al.
Pageof 5